Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
These verses cannot be struck out. The fourth book is just as little
Tibullus’ own: the panegyric on Messalla is the production of some poor
fellow who was in want of a patron, and certainly not that of a knight.
Both books, the third and the fourth, are by authors who are inferior to
Tibullus. The smaller poems which bear the names of Sulpicia and
Cerinthus, may be Tibullus’ own; but they are almost too good to be his:
there is too much strength and boldness in them. To me, Tibullus is an
unpleasing poet: this womanish and maudlin grief, this unantique
sentimentality, are mistaken tones of Mimnermus, which to me are
unbearable; and above all, in a Roman.
Somewhat older perhaps than Horace was Cornelius Gallus, a man of rank
who had also tried his fortune in war, and whom Augustus had appointed
governor of Egypt, in which post indeed he behaved shamefully. He must,
however, have had his amiable qualities, as Virgil was so fond of him,
and introduced his praise in the fourth book of the Georgics: it was to
replace it, that the poet had afterwards to put in the episode of
Aristæus. Having been convicted of very disgraceful things, Gallus put
an end to his own life. He had translated Euphorion, and written
elegies, of which, however, one line only remains. He must have been a
distinguished poet, though what goes under his name, all but a few
fragments, is not genuine. If he is called _durior_, this perhaps
implies that he had the old language and versification of Catullus and
Lucretius, which Quinctilian might indeed have found harsh.
One who also lived at the same time as these men, was Varius. Of him we
have unfortunately but a few verses; the ancients, however, ranked him
with Virgil and Horace among the great poets of that age; he was
especially renowned for his tragedy of Thyestes. This is a very unhappy
subject; and I am afraid that there was a good deal of rant in that
piece, and that it stood in the same relation to Greek tragedy as the
Æneid to the Iliad. The tragic poets of that age in all likelihood no
longer had before them the old Athenian tragedy, like Pacuvius and
Attius, but the Alexandrian; for what was called the Pleias, was
certainly something quite different from the old tragic poets. One may
get an idea of it from Seneca, whose pieces are certainly not of Roman
home-growth, but evidently formed after foreign models: his lyrical part
is limited to anapæsts, and very rarely contains quite simple strophes
of four lines. If I had the choice, I would rather have Varius’ poem _De
Morte_ than his tragedy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account