Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
This was the noble group of the poets of that age, such as seldom have
met together in this world. These poets Augustus found living when he
made himself master of the state; they have passed the shortest part of
their lives under his rule. But now a second generation arose, which is
really to be called the Augustan. It begins with Propertius, whose poems
are evidently imitations from the Alexandrian school; whereas Horace
kept to the older lyric style, although Virgil already begins to follow
somewhat in the track of the poets of Alexandria and Pergamus.
Propertius must have been born about 700. He was a native of Umbria, and
his youth was about the time of the assignments of land: it was his
ambition to be the Roman Callimachus or Philetas.
Much greater than he,—in fact, of all the Roman poets whose works have
come down to us, by far the most poetical after Catullus,—was Ovid, born
in 709. Virgil is evidently disheartened by his lot; Horace’s mind was
painfully distracted in another way, as he fondly loved Brutus;
Tibullus, with his feeling heart, was weighed down by evil times;
Propertius was so affected by the early loss of his property, that free
enjoyment of life and perfect ease never returned to him: but as for
Catullus, on the other hand, the unbounded freedom of his humour sprang
from the independence of his fortune. His father must have been one of
the most eminent men in his province; he was a guest-friend of Cæsar.
Ovid was born with one of the most happy dispositions that heaven can
give, at a time when the troubles of the Perusian war could only reach
him in his cradle; he was in his thirteenth year when Cæsar Octavianus
conquered at Actium: thus his lightheartedness and cheerfulness arose
from the circumstances of the age in which he lived. On this we are all
of us dependent: my own tone of mind is quite different from what it
would have been had I been born thirty years sooner or later. Ovid was a
young man of rank and wealth at Sulmo, who began the world adorned with
every gift of mind and body: a greater facility no man could have, and
in this respect, he is among the very first poets. In Schiller’s poems,
one may every where remark his struggle with the forms of verse, and the
toil with which he worked; whilst in Goethe’s early productions,
everything is as if written off-hand. The Greek lyric poets also are
never far-fetched; it is as if they could express themselves only in the
way in which they did, and in none other: Horace, unlike them, is
plodding, and it is but seldom that anything, as it were, bubbles out of
him. In Ovid, all comes fresh from the heart: his faults, which also run
through his poetry, are well known. The cause of his misfortune is a
riddle which no human sagacity will ever be able to make out; and the
endless stories which have been spread about it are but so many
absurdities. The utter depression of his mind during his abode in Tomi
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account