Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
spoken; and thus it was that the change into the Arabic became so easy
in those parts. It is very likely that the present language of Tunis is
by no means Arabic in reality, but that it still contains much of the
Punic: many Latin elements are preserved in it; as for instance, the use
of the preposition _de_ to express the genitive.
Greek literature kept rising: the eastern world, owing to Hadrian’s
partiality, had not only got to a far greater height of literary wealth
and originality, but also of pride and vanity. Then arose the witty
Lucian, who indeed has been overrated for some time, but whom we should
by no means make light of. His pure Attic style calls forth our
admiration, as he certainly spoke nothing but Syriac until he had grown
up to be a young man. On the whole, all the eastern world at that time
went on cheerfully, whilst the West moved sluggishly: the East had
ceased to look upon itself as subdued, since the right of Roman
citizenship already extended over millions, every emperor conferring it
on new countries. In the days of the Antonines also lived Lucian, Galen,
Pausanias (who indeed is less ingenious, but very useful and important
for us), Aristides, that most disagreeable writer, and the whole school
of Greek rhetoricians who looked upon themselves as forming the second
grand era of eloquence. These wrote after the ancient models, but alas!
there is nothing in their works: whenever they have something to write
about, they show no want of talent. This is also the case with the Latin
writers. Apuleius shows talent wherever he has a subject, as in that
eccentric book, the Metamorphoses, and in his Apology; and so does
Tertullian, as for instance, when he writes against the theatre, having
a truth to deal with. On the other hand, Aristides’ declamation on the
battle of Leuctra is really insufferable. Tertullian should be read much
more generally by philologists, and so should the Fathers on the whole;
for this we have before us the bright example of such great men as
Scaliger, Hemsterhuys, Valckenaer, and others. We cannot thoroughly know
the history of those times, unless we study the writings of a Justin
Martyr, Clement of Alexandria, and Athenagoras.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account