Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
Of the events which now follow, I can give you but an outline, such as
every one ought to know by heart. Too great a stress was formerly laid
on such a chronological skeleton of history; yet it ought not to be
altogether neglected: the succession of the Roman emperors, with the
dates of their reigns, is what every one ought to have in his memory.
Diocletian had reigned for about a year, when, without any external
cause, he took his countryman Maximian as his colleague. Of Diocletian
we have many hostile accounts; but they are very much exaggerated, nor
are they the only ones. It is said that his father had been a slave, or
at best a freedman; by this, however, a _colonus_, perhaps is meant,
that is to say, a serf from the Dalmatian frontier. He cannot himself
have been a slave, as slaves were not yet at that time received in the
legions: the derivation of his name from Doclea, a town on the Dalmatian
frontier, is a very likely one indeed. Diocletian had risen in the army
by his own merit, a fact which sufficiently refutes the charge of
cowardice brought against him as well as many other great generals, such
as Napoleon. Against the latter also this charge is highly unjust. He
often wanted moral courage, as, for instance, on the 19th of Brumaire;
but the courage of a general he had. He is taxed with cowardice in cases
when he did not choose to place himself in a position in which he could
neither see nor hear, and thus neglect his duties as a general; but in
so doing he was perfectly justified. Only he ought to have died at
Waterloo: his leaving that battlefield can never be excused.—Diocletian
was, on the whole, a mild man. On two occasions only, he laid himself
open to the charge of cruelty,—in his chastisement of the rebels at
Alexandria, and in his persecution of the Christians, to the latter of
which he was beguiled in his old age by Galerius. Maximian, on the
contrary, was a coarse and cruel man, who murdered the Roman nobles to
get held of their treasures; or because he had been offended; or else
because their very rank annoyed him: for the senate seems now to have
become more and more hereditary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account