Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
Diocletian, who was a man of uncommon shrewdness, could not disguise
from himself, how highly dangerous it was to keep jarring elements
together by force. He therefore bethought himself of what would seem the
strange plan of healing the many splits between the East and the West by
a distinct government for each under different princes, they being,
however, so united by one common centre, as still to form one whole.
This worked well so long as he reigned himself. The legislative power,
the consulship, and the high offices were to be in common: but in both
parts of the empire there was to be a distinct _Augustus_; and by the
side of every Augustus a _Cæsar_ as his coadjutor, who was to succeed to
the throne after his death. The latter clause was to prevent the throne
from being kept vacant, or being given away by the soldiers. It would
seem that the senior Augustus had the right of naming the Cæsars. The
_Præfectura Galliarum_ (which consisted of Gaul, Britain, and Spain),
together with Mauretania, was to have a Cæsar; Italy and Africa were
placed under the immediate rule of the Augustus. The countries on the
Danube, Pannonia and Mœsia (afterwards the _præfectura_ of Illyria),
were likewise under a Cæsar: the other Augustus had the whole of the
East. All these were ingenious combinations: but they showed by their
result, what such combinations will generally lead to.
Diocletian reigned for twenty years (from 285 to 305), and then by his
paramount influence, he got Maximian to resign his dignity at the same
time with him (May 1st, 305); so that, while he was yet living, the
machine might be set up anew. The Cæsar in the East, Galerius, and his
colleague Constantius, were both of them Illyrians. The former was a
common soldier who had gotten the surname of _Armentarius_ from having
been a drover; the other (to whom we do not give the name of Chlorus, as
it is only to be found in Byzantine writers, and not even in the earlier
ones, nor on coins; and as we are not able to make out its derivation)
was of high birth, his father being a man of rank in the diocese of
Illyricum, and his mother a niece of the Emperor Claudius Gothicus. The
two were of a very different stamp. Constantius was an accomplished and
well educated gentleman; Galerius was a rough fellow: both of them,
however, were distinguished generals, though indeed Galerius was the
bolder of the two. This division led afterwards to that of the empire
into prefectures: not only every Augustus, but also every Cæsar had his
_præfectus prætorio_; whence arose the four dioceses, each of which had
a _præfectus_, as we see at a later period, there being traces of it
even in the times of Justinian. Of the other measures of Diocletian, we
shall mention here but the following. He transplanted the ceremonial of
the East into his court: neither of the two emperors, however, resided
at Rome; Maximian lived at Milan; Diocletian, in Nicomedia. Whatever may
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account