Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
For this consulship, Cicero indeed got thanks for the moment; but
instead of gaining for him lasting gratitude, it only brought upon him
enmity and detraction. This is one of the saddest lessons taught us by
the observation of human affairs. It is quite natural for a
distinguished man to put forth his claims to acknowledgment; just as the
striving after truth is a deep-rooted impulse of our nature:—a true
saint, like Vincent de Paul, could alone have raised himself above such
a weakness. Plato justly says, “the last garment which the pure man
doffs, is the love of fame;” and when he does cast it off, he generally
stands on most dangerous ground. When I bethink myself of the crying
evil of our age, then I see with pain that there are so few who are bent
upon seeking deathless fame: this wretched unsatisfying life, which is
all for the present moment, leads to no good. He who yearns after glory
from posterity, is sure to be a good man; and even his own age also must
acknowledge, and must honour him. The only poetical genius among the
Germans now living, Count Platen, has a painful longing after renown,
and often speaks of his not being appreciated by the men of his day.
Cicero was of a morbid sensibility: if it is in the power of a great man
always to command and to act, he cares less whether he is honoured or
not; but if he is only able to command the souls of men, and not their
bodies, he is much more susceptible with regard to such matters. Cicero
was keenly, and even morbidly alive to anything like a slight; any
injury, or ill-will, any kind of envy upset him. Unhappily, he tried to
overcome this by putting himself forward to show to the people what he
was, sometimes chiding, and at other times remonstrating with them. They
were certainly the vainest of all men, who in the most highly edifying
language forsooth! have written on Cicero’s vanity: I am grieved at it,
as I love Cicero as if I had known him, and also feel hurt by the scoffs
which even the ancients already uttered against him. A source of great
heart-burning to him, was the mortification which he suffered from
Pompey’s indifference. He must have known very little of the latter
before he went to Asia, and they can only have met during Pompey’s first
consulship; on what terms of friendliness they were, cannot be known: at
that time, Cicero was ædile. Afterwards, Pompey was for the most part
absent, whereas Cicero was always at Rome. Pompey, full of his victories
over Mithridates, thought of no one in all the republic but himself; and
when Cicero wrote an unfortunate letter to him in Asia, in which he told
him of the events in Rome, to make him aware of what he himself had done
for the good of the country, he answered coldly: he took it as an
offence, that Cicero should have presumed, in the face of his own
achievements, to speak of what he too had done for his country. Another
motive were the aristocratical airs which Pompey was pleased to give
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account