Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
His genius was most versatile: he possessed an unexampled facility and
power in all that could be done by intellect; he had an excellent
memory, together with presence of mind, and the firmest reliance on
himself and his good fortune, being confident that he must succeed in
everything. Owing to this great facility, most of his acquirements were
not the fruits of the toilsome drudgery of the school, but of the
cultivation and exercise of his great talents: thus it was with his
eloquence and his style. In the very fact that he owed nothing to art,
and everything to himself, lay the chief secret of his wonderful power.
He had made himself master of many branches of knowledge; for while they
interested him, he devoted to them all his energy and attention. He was
particularly remarkable for his acuteness and keen observation; and it
is certainly no small honour for grammar that Cæsar was so fond of it:
his work on analogy would very likely be as much superior to all the
grammars of that time, as his history was to all other works of the same
kind which are founded on personal observation. The same originality is
also manifest in his strategical talents: his sound, strong intellect
clearly marks its aim, and then finds out for itself the means of
attaining it. He was no intriguer; of all those plots which were then so
general, he knew nothing: on the contrary, he was the frankest person in
the world, which was the very reason why he was often so little on his
guard. Not a few of the arbitrary acts of which he was guilty, were
merely the consequences of a former want of caution, of frankness and
openness. His kindliness of soul, his mildness and humanity, he showed
after his victory in a manner which could never have been expected from
him; nor was there anything artificial in it. Augustus was an actor in
all he did; but Cæsar was always true and open-hearted. Had he lived in
times when the machine of the state was smoothly going on, and was not
yet rusty and disorganised, when it was still possible to govern the
republic with a strong, sound hand,—as for instance, in the days of
Scipio; or, had he been born on the throne, he would calmly have gone
through his career, and without destroying anything, have most
brilliantly reached the goal. But he was thrown upon a time, when as
Göthe says, “one must needs be either anvil or hammer;” and of course
the choice was not difficult. Cato might dream as long as he liked, that
there was still hope with the _fæx plebis_, and that the age of Curius
and Fabricius were not yet over; Cicero might trim and tack about in
this republic, if he chose; but Cæsar could not do otherwise than rule
the circumstances in which he found himself, and he had unremittingly,
untiringly to advance towards the mark which he had in view. That he was
unscrupulous in his wars, cannot be denied: his Gallic wars are for the
most part downright crimes; his conduct towards the Usipetes and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account