Nineteen Centuries of Drink in England: A HistoryFrench, Richard Valpy
History
Nineteen Centuries of Drink in England: A History
French, Richard Valpy
Drinking customs -- England; Drinking of alcoholic beverages -- Great Britain; England -- Social life and customs
additional burden, and must be supported through a miserable life
by that labour which they cannot share, and must be protected by
that community of which they cannot contribute to the defence.[215]
Notwithstanding volleys of violent opposition, especially from the
Bishops, the Bill was carried: sixty per cent. of the House voting in
its favour. The law was again relaxed. Parliament was overwhelmed with
petitions which were the expression of a disappointed philanthropy.
The petitions of the Lord Mayor and Corporation of London, state,
‘that the common and habitual use of spirituous liquors by the
lower ranks of people, prevails to such a degree, that _it
destroys the health, strength, and industry of the poor of both
sexes and all ages, inflames them with rage and barbarity, and
occasions frequent robberies and murders in the streets of the
Metropolis_.’ The petition from the Minister and Churchwardens of
St. Martin’s, Westminster, recites that in consequence of the low
price of spirits, their use has become excessive--‘the substance of
the people is wasted--idleness and disorder have taken the place
of industry--and robberies and murders are committed under their
influence.’ The petition from Bristol states, ‘that the bad effects
of spirituous liquors have become apparent in the destruction of
the habits of the people--corrupting their morals, and rendering
them incapable of manly employments’--reducing them to poverty,
_and hardening them to the commission of crimes of the utmost
enormity_. That of the Merchants adds--‘commerce was injured.’
These crowds of petitions almost universally affirm that the _great
increase in the number of Gin-shops, and the low price of the
article_, were the causes of its excessive use _amongst the lower
orders_.
On these representations, the House again resolved ‘That it was
necessary to regulate the sale of spirits by retail.’ Measures were
adopted for the _suppression of smuggling_, and the celebrated
Tippling Act was passed.[216]
By this Act, no persons could recover for the price of spirits sold in
less quantities than 20_s._ at one time.
But just in proportion as spirits were rendered legally inaccessible,
appetite was diverted into the channel of beer. The rent was made
possibly worse. Hitherto it had been necessary to impose restrictions
upon the article sold; now the vendor must furnish guarantees. The
26th of the same George, after declaring former laws to be defective
and insufficient, required the justices, when they granted licences,
to take the recognisances of the _persons_ licensed in 10_l._, and two
sureties of 5_l._, for _good conduct_, with other restrictions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account