No cross, no crown : $b a discourse shewing the nature and discipline of the holy cross of ChristPenn, William
Religion
No cross, no crown : $b a discourse shewing the nature and discipline of the holy cross of Christ
Penn, William
Christian life; Christian life -- Quaker authors; Self-denial -- Early works to 1800
IX. Again these things, which have been hitherto condemned, have
never been the conversation or practice of the holy men and women of
old times, whom the Scriptures recommend for holy examples, worthy
of imitation. Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were plain men, and princes,
as graziers are, over their families and flocks. They were not
solicitous for the vanities so much lived in by the people of this
generation, for they pleased God by faith. The first forsook his
father's house, kindred, and country; a true type or figure of that
self-denial all must know, that would have Abraham to their father.
They must not think to live in those pleasures, fashions, and
customs they are called to leave; no, but part with all hopes of the
great recompense of reward, and that better country which is eternal
in the heavens. (Heb. xi. 26, 15; Rom. v. 1.) The prophets were
generally poor; one a shepherd, another a herdsman, &c. They often
cried out unto the full-fed wanton Israelites to repent, to fear and
dread the living God, to forsake the sins and vanities they lived
in; but they never imitated them. John the Baptist, the messenger
of the Lord, preached his embassy to the world in a coat of
camel's-hair, a rough and homely garment. (Matt. iii. 4.) Nor can it
be conceived that Jesus Christ himself was much better apparelled,
who, according to the flesh, was of poor descent, and in life, of
great plainness; insomuch that it was usual in a way of derision to
say, "Is not this Jesus, the carpenter, the son of Mary?" (Matt.
xiii. 55; Mark, vi. 3.) And this Jesus tells his followers, "That
as for soft raiment, gorgeous apparel and delicacies, they were for
king's courts:" (Luke, vii. 25:) implying, that He and his followers
were not to seek after those things; but seems thereby to express
the great difference that was betwixt the lovers of the fashions and
customs of the world, and those whom He had chosen out of it. And He
did not only come in that mean and despicable manner himself, that
He might stain the pride of all flesh, but therein became exemplary
to his followers, what a self-denying life they must lead, if they
would be his true disciples. Nay, He further leaves it with them in
a parable, to the end that it might make the deeper impression, and
that they might see how inconsistent a pompous, worldly-pleasing
life is with the kingdom He came to establish and call men to the
possession of: and that is the remarkable story of Dives, who is
represented first, as a rich man; (Luke, xvi. 19. &c.;) next as a
voluptuous man, in his rich apparel, his many dishes, and his pack
of dogs; and lastly, as an uncharitable man, or one who was more
concerned to please the lust of the eye, the lust of the flesh, and
the pride of life, and fare sumptuously every day, than to take
compassion of poor Lazarus at his gate: no, his dogs were more
pitiful and kind than he. But what was the doom of this jolly man,
this great rich man? We read it was everlasting torment; but that of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account