No cross, no crown : $b a discourse shewing the nature and discipline of the holy cross of ChristPenn, William
Religion
No cross, no crown : $b a discourse shewing the nature and discipline of the holy cross of Christ
Penn, William
Christian life; Christian life -- Quaker authors; Self-denial -- Early works to 1800
government there shall be no end." (Isa. ix. 7.)
XXXI. The next Scripture instance I urge against these customs, is a
passage in Job, thus expressed: "Let me not, I pray you, accept any
man's person; neither let me give flattering titles unto man, for I
know not to give flattering titles; in so doing, my Maker would soon
take me away." (Job, xxxii. 21, 22.) The question that will arise
upon the allegation of this Scripture is this, viz. What titles are
flattering? The answer is as obvious, namely, Such as are empty and
fictitious, and make him more than he is: as to call a man what he
is not, to please him; or to exalt him beyond his true name, office,
or desert, to gain upon his affections; who, it may be, lusteth to
honour and respect: such as these,--most excellent, most sacred,
your grace, your lordship, most dread majesty, right honourable,
right worshipful, may it please your majesty, your grace, your
lordship, your honour, your worship, and the like unnecessary titles
and attributes, calculated only to please and tickle poor, proud,
vain, yet mortal man. Likewise to call man what he is not, as my
lord, my master, &c., and wise, just, or good, when he is neither,
only to please him, or show him respect.
It was familiar thus to do among the Jews, under their degeneracy;
wherefore one came to Christ, and said, "Good master, what shall I
do to have eternal life?" (Luke, xviii. 18.) It was a salutation or
address of respect in those times. It is familiar now: good my lord,
good sir, good master, do this, or do that. But what was Christ's
answer? how did he take it? "Why callest thou me good?" says Christ;
"there is none good, save one, that is God." (Verse 19.) He rejected
it that had more right to keep it than all mankind: and why? Because
there was one greater than he; and that he saw the man addressed it
to his manhood, after the way of the times, and not to his divinity
which dwelt within it: therefore Christ refuses it, showing and
instructing us that we should not give such epithets and titles
commonly to men; for good being due alone to God and godliness, it
can only be said in flattery to fallen man, and therefore sinful to
be so said.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account