North Carolina Medical Journal. Vol. 3. No. 4. April, 1879Various
Science
North Carolina Medical Journal. Vol. 3. No. 4. April, 1879
Various
Medicine -- North Carolina -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals
Diseases of the domestic animals deserve more study from the medical
profession than they receive. Medical men even now submit their horses
to the treatment of the neighborhood blacksmith and farrier, whose
ignorance and brutality is all but universal, rather than inform
themselves of the phenomena of brute diseases; in fact, some medical men
hold it as beneath their dignified calling to give their attention to
such affairs. Fortunately now a better day is dawning, and books like
this will do a great deal towards enticing physicians into this
neglected field. There is no practice that promises such profitable
returns as the educated and skillful management of diseases of domestic
animals.
We advise our friends in the country to put this volume side by side on
their book-shelves with Youatt, and soon the latter would be but a
shelf-keeper alongside their new acquaintance.
The point of view from which the study of the diseases of domestic
animals is growing in importance, is the relation of their diseases to
ours.
To be able to detect measly beef and mutton is an accomplishment that
every physician should acquire, now that we know that tape-worm has its
origin there. And we should also be stimulated to earnest enquiry when
we remember what great results JENNER brought out of the study of
cow-pox.
BIENNIAL REPORT OF THE NORTH CAROLINA INSTITUTION FOR THE DEAF AND
DUMB AND THE BLIND. From January 1st, 1877 to January 1879. 32d and
33d Sessions. Raleigh: Published by order of the Board of Trustees.
The last Legislature was famous for fault-finding, but had nothing but
praise for the Institution presided over by Mr. Gudger. His report shows
good work done, and common sense ideas of the theories of the methods of
teaching of those unfortunates under his care.
Mr. Gudger reviews the arguments of the advocates of the Manual method,
and the Articulation method, of instructing deaf mutes as follows:
“There is a ground, however, upon which the advocates of each system can
meet and agree. In most of the larger institutions articulation has been
introduced and is a success, when the class to be instructed consists of
those who, having heard in childhood and learnt to speak, have become
deaf (and so are in danger of losing what speech they have) or of those
who are partly deaf and consequently not able to catch the delicate
shades of sound in different words similar to each other. As these
persons have some language to build upon, and an idea of sound, it is
comparatively easy, by means of the skillful methods in use, to improve
and advance their knowledge in this particular, especially as the
teacher may use the _known_ in getting at the _unknown_; but to attempt
to teach articulation to an ordinary congenital deaf-mute, is to spend
valuable time in that which gives promise of little fruit. In other
words, as our matter-of-fact American people would express it, ‘_It does
not pay._’”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account