Notes and Queries, No. 209, October 29 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. — John Shaqi
Notes and Queries, No. 209, October 29 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, No. 209, October 29 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
[The origin of this phrase is involved in some obscurity. Jacob, in
his _Law Dictionary_, speaks of it as "from the French," and his
definition is _verbatim_ that given in _The Termes of the Law_ (ed.
1598), with a very slight addition. Blackstone (book II cap. 12.)
says, "which term I shall explain in the very words of Littleton:
'It seemeth that this word _hotchpot_ is in English a pudding; for
in a pudding is not commonly just one thing alone, but one thing
with other things together.' By this housewifely metaphor our
ancestors meant to inform us that the lands, both those given in
frankmarriage, and those descending in fee-simple, should be mixed
and blended together, and then divided in equal portions among all
the daughters."]
_High and Low Dutch._--Is there any essential difference between High
and Low Dutch; and if there be any, to which set do the Dutchmen at the
Cape of Good Hope belong?
S. C. P.
[High and Low Dutch are vulgarisms to express the German and the
Dutch languages, which those nations themselves call, for the German
_Deutsch_, for the Dutch _Hollaendisch_. The latter is the language
which the Dutch colonists of the Cape carried with them, when that
colony was conquered by them from the Portuguese; and has for its
base the German as spoken before Martin Luther's translation of the
Bible made the dialect of Upper Saxony the written language of the
entire German empire.]
_"A Wilderness of Monkeys."_--Would you kindly inform me where the
expression is to be found: "I would not do such or such a thing for a
wilderness of monkeys?"
C. A.
Ripley.
["_Tubal._ One of them showed me a ring that he had of your daughter
for a monkey.
"_Shylock._ Out upon her! Thou torturest me, Tubal: it was my
turquoise; I had it of Leah, when I was a bachelor: I would not have
given it for _a wilderness of monkies_."--_Merchant of Venice_, Act
III. Sc. 1.]
_Splitting Paper._--Could any of your readers give the receipt for
splitting paper, say a bank-note? In no book can I find it, but I
believe that it is known by many.
H. C.
Liverpool.
[Paste the paper which is to be split between two pieces of calico;
and, when thoroughly dry, tear them asunder. The paper will split,
and, when the calico is wetted, is easily removed from it.]
_The Devil on Two Sticks in England._--Who is the author of a work,
entitled as under?
"The Devil upon Two Sticks in England; being a Continuation of Le Diable
Boiteux of Le Sage. London: printed at the Logographic Press, and sold
by T. Walter, No. 169. Piccadilly; and W. Richardson, under the Royal
Exchange, 1790."
It is a work of very considerable merit, an imitation in style and
manner of Le Sage, but original in its matter. It is published in six
volumes 8vo.
WILLIAM NEWMAN.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account