And now, having given you a Note, I will add a Query, and ask, Can any one inform me what became of this library, or who were the representatives and heirs of Edward Lee, through whom this MS. may have passed to Mr. Conybeare, or give me any further particulars respecting this Edward Lee? A person who asks a question in such a publication as yours ought to endeavour to answer one. I add therefore that Mr. Thorpe--no mean authority on such a point--in his _Catalogue_ for 1834, No. 1234, says the E.F. in the title-page of _The Life of King Edward II_, represents "E. Falkland:" but he does not tell us who E. Falkland was, and it is questionable whether there was any person so named living at the time when the book in question was written. There was no Edward Lord Falkland before the reign of William III. Also, in answer to Dr. Maitland's Query respecting the fate of Bindley's copy of _Borde's Dyetary of Health_, 1567, in a priced copy of the Catalogue now before me, the name of Rodd stands as the purchaser for eleven shillings. JOSEPH HUNTER. Nov. 26. 1849 * * * * * QUERIES ANSWERED, NO. 3. _A Flemish Account, &c._ The readiness with which we adopt a _current saying_, though unaware of its source and therefore somewhat uncertain as to the proper mode of applying it, is curiously exemplified by the outstanding query on the origin and primary signification of the phrase _A Flemish account_. I have consulted, in search of it, dictionaries of various dates, the glossaries of our dramatic annotators, and the best collections of proverbs and proverbial sayings--but without success. The _saying_ casts no reproach on the Flemings. It always means, I believe that the sum to be received turns out less than had been expected. It is a commercial joke, and admits of explanation by reference to the early commercial transactions between the English and the Flemings. I rely on the authority of _The merchants mappe of commerce_, by Lewes Roberts, London, 1638, folio, chap. 179:-- In Antwerp, which _gave rule in trade_ to most other cities, the accounts were kept in _livres, sols, and deniers_; which they termed pounds, shillings, and pence _of grosses_. Now the _livre_ was equal only to twelve shillings sterling, so that while the Antwerp merchant stated a balance of 1l. 13s. 4d., the London merchant would receive only 1l.--which he might fairly call _A Flemish account!_ The same instructive author furnishes me with a passage in illustration of a recent question on the _three golden balls_, which seem to require additional research. It occurs in chap. 181:--