Notes and Queries, Number 178, March 26, 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Number 178, March 26, 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
"The 'left' hand, as distinguished from the right, is the hand which we
'leave,' inasmuch as for twenty times we use the right hand, we do not
once employ _it_; and it obtains its name from being 'left' unused so
often."
Now I should certainly be sorry to appear
"Ut lethargicus hic, cum fit pugil, et medicum urget."
I am not the person to aim a word at Mr. Trench's eye. Although I am
Boeotian enough to ask, I am not too far Boeotian to feel no shame in
asking, whether it is quite impossible that "left" should be corruption of
_lævus_, [Greek: laios]. We have, at all events, adopted _dexter_, the
"right" hand, and the rest of its family.
BOEOTICUS.
Edgmond, Salop.
_The Parthenon._--M. de Chateaubriand says that the Greek, Theodore
Zygomalas, who wrote in 1575, is the first among modern writers to have
made known the existence of the Temple of Minerva or Parthenon, which was
believed to have been totally destroyed. The _Messager des Sciences et des
Arts de la Belgique_, vol. iv. p. 24., corrects Chateaubriand, and says
that Ciriaco d'Ancona had, in the year 1436, described this celebrated
monument, together with other ancient buildings of Athens. I am desirous of
verifying this statement, and for this purpose beg the assistance of some
of your learned correspondents, who may probably be able to inform me what
is the title and date of the work of Ciriaco in which this description of
the Parthenon occurs.
W. M. R. E.
* * * * *
Replies.
MEDIÆVAL OR MIDDLE AGES.
(Vol. v., p. 469.)
The question there put by L. T. is still constantly asked, and the answer
given by a reference to Mr. Dowling's work may perhaps be unsatisfactory to
many, as not sufficiently defining the period at which the Middle Ages may
be said to terminate. By some of the best historical writers, the
commencement and termination are variously stated. In a work recently
published by George T. Manning, entitled _Outlines of the History of the
Middle Ages_, with heads of analysis, &c., the Querist seems answered with
more precision. Mr. Manning divides General History into _three_ great
divisions--Ancient History, that of the Middle Ages, and Modern History;
the first division extending from the Creation to about four hundred years
after the birth of Christ; the second from A.D. 400 to the close of the
fifteenth century of the Christian era; the third embracing those ages
which have elapsed since the close of mediæval times.
The Middle Age portions he divides into _five_ great periods, denoted by
the vast changes which took place in the course of that history, viz.:
A.D. 400 to A.D. 800, _First Period_.
A.D. 800 to A.D. 964, _Second Period_.
A.D. 964 to A.D. 1066, _Third Period_.
A.D. 1066 to A.D. 1300, _Fourth Period_.
A.D. 1300 to A.D. 1500, _Fifth Period_.
The doubling of the Cape of Good Hope being the last important event, which
he places in 1497.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account