Notes and Queries, Number 199, August 20, 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Geneologists, etc. — John Shaqi
Notes and Queries, Number 199, August 20, 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Geneologists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Number 199, August 20, 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Geneologists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
2. Is it true that it was removed in the way that I have stated?
3. If so, in whose possession is the stone at this present time?
M. A.
_Mammon._--Perhaps some of your readers could refer me to some work
containing information in reference to the following allegation of
Barnes, on Matt. vi. 24.:
"Mammon is a Syriac word, _a name given to an idol worshipped
as the god of riches_. It has the same meaning as Plutus
among the Greeks. It is not known that the Jews even formally
worshipped _this idol_, but they used the word to denote
wealth."
My question relates to the passages in Italics.
B. H. C.
_Derivation of Wellesley._--In a note to the lately published
_Autobiographic Sketches_ of Thomas De Quincey, I find (p. 131.) the
following passage:
"It had been always known that some relationship existed
between the Wellesleys and John Wesley. Their names had in fact
been originally the same; and the Duke of Wellington himself,
in the earlier part of his career, when sitting in the Irish
House of Commons, was always known to the Irish journals as
Captain Wesley. Upon this arose a natural belief, that the
aristocratic branch of the house had improved the name into
Wellesley. But the true process of change had been precisely
the other way. Not Wesley had been expanded into Wellesley,
but inversely, Wellesley had been contracted by household
usage into Wesley. The name must have been _Wellesley_ in its
earliest stage, since it was founded upon a connexion with
Wells Cathedral."
May I ask what this connexion was, and whence the authority for the
statement? Had the illustrious Duke's adoption of his title from another
town in Somersetshire anything to do with it?
J. M.
Cranwells, Bath.
_The Battle of Cruden--A Query for Copenhagen Correspondents._--In the
year 1059, in the reign of Malcolm III., king of Scotland, a battle was
fought on the Links of Cruden, in the county of Aberdeen, between the
Danes and the Scots, in which the Prince Royal, who commanded the Danish
forces, was slain. He was buried on the Danish field, near to which,
according to the custom of the times, King Malcolm "biggit ane kirk."
This church was overblown with sand, and another built farther inland,
which is the present parish church. To the churchyard wall there leans a
black marble gravestone, about 7 ft. × 3 ft. 6 in., which is said to have
been sent from Denmark as a monument for the grave of his royal highness.
The stone has the appearance of considerable antiquity about it, and
appears to have been inlaid with marble, let into it about half an inch;
the marks of the iron brads, and the lead which secured it, are still
visible.
"Tradition says it did from Denmark come,
A monument the king sent for his son."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account