Notes and Queries, Number 200, August 27, 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Geneologists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Number 200, August 27, 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Geneologists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
"_Up, Guards, and at them!_" (Vol. v., p. 426.; Vol. viii., pp. 111.
184.).--It will, I hope, close all debate on this anecdote, to state that
the account I gave of it in Vol. v., p. 426., was from the Duke himself.
I thought it very unlike him to have given his order in such a phrase,
and I asked him how the fact was, and he answered me to the effect I have
already stated.
C.
_German Heraldry_ (Vol. viii., p. 150.).--Your Querist will probably find
what he inquires for in Fursten's _German Arms_, published at Nurenberg
in folio, 1696. The plates are sometimes divided and bound in three
or four oblong volumes. The work known as Fursten's _German Arms_ was
commenced by Siebmacker, continued by Furst and Helman, and, in 1714, by
Weigel. It is often quoted under these respective names; but of later
years, more frequently under that of Weigel's _Book of German Arms_
(Weigel Wapenbuch). It consists of six Parts, and professes to give the
arms of the principal nobility of the Roman kingdom: dukes, princes,
princely counts; lords and persons of position, foregone and existing, in
all the provinces and states of the German empire. The Preface is by John
David Köhler.
G.
In the year 1698 a book was published by J. A. Rudolphi, at Nurenberg,
entitled _Heraldica Curiosa_. It is in German, a thin folio, with an
innumerable quantity of engravings of the arms of German families.
J. B.
_The Eye_ (Vol. viii., p. 25.).--I hope that interesting question raised
by your correspondent H. C. K., respecting the term "apple of the eye,"
will meet with attention from some philologist. It might help to solve
it, if it could be discovered when the phrase first came into use in our
language. Is it possible that the word "apple" is a corruption of the
Latin "pupilla?" or is it, according to H. C. K.'s suggestion, that the
iris, and not the pupil, is taken to represent an apple? Doubtless your
learned correspondent is aware that in Zech. ii. 12. the Hebrew phrase
is varied, the word בָּבָה being used, and occurring only in this
passage. If Gesenius's derivation of this word be correct, which makes
it to signify "the gate of the eye," we have this idea put into a fresh
shape. Have not the Arabs a phrase, "He is dearer to me than the _pupil_
of mine eye," as well as the other one, "The man of the eye?" Curiously
enough, the Greeks express this idea by another word than κόρη, viz.
γλήνη (_i. e._ κόρης αὐγή, the splendour of the pupil (kin. αἴγλη), or
the pupil itself, οφθαλμου κόρη), in which the change of signification
is exactly the converse of what it is in κόρη; viz., 1st, pupil; 2nd, a
little girl; whence, as a term of reproach, ἔῤῥε κακὴ γλήνη.
QUÆSTOR.
_Canute's Point, Southampton_ (Vol. vii., p. 380.).--A correspondent
having noticed the inscription on the Canute Castle Inn, Southampton,
inquires for proof to authenticate the locality of the tradition referred
to. I submit the following extract from a local history:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account