"Come away, Elves! while the dew is sweet, Come to the dingles where fairies meet; Know that the lilies have spread their bells O'er all the pools in our forest dells; Come away, under arching bows we'll float, Making each urn a fairy boat; We'll row them with reeds o'er the fountains free, And a tall flag-leaf shall our streamer be. And we'll send out wild music so sweet and low, It shall seem from the bright flower's heart to flow; As if 'twere a breeze with a flute's low sigh, Or water-drops train'd into melody, And a star from the depth of each pearly cup, A golden star into heav'n looks up, As if seeking its kindred where bright they lie, Set in the blue of the summer sky." J. YEOWELL. _Sir Arthur Aston_ (Vol. viii., pp. 126. 302.).--Though unable to inform CHARTHAM and A READER in what part of the co. of Berks the above cavalier resided during the interval of time named by the former, I think I can state the connexion, by marriage only, between the Tattersall and Aston families: I believe it will be found that they were not "nearly related." Thomas Howard, fourth duke of Norfolk, by his first wife, Mary Fitzalan, had Philip (_jure matris_), Earl of Arundel, who died 1595 attainted, and was succeeded by Thomas, created Earl of Norfolk. This last was father of Henry Frederick and grandfather of Charles Howard, of Greystock Castle, who married Mary, eldest daughter and coheiress of George Tattersall, of West Court, Finchampstead, and Stapleford, co. Wilts. Charles Howard, as above, was the fourth brother of Henry, sixth Duke of Norfolk, which last was grandfather (through Thomas, his son, of Worksop) of Mary Howard, who married Walter Aston, fourth Baron Aston, of Forfar, in Scotland. H. C. C. I furnished a memoir of this famous soldier to the _Gentleman's Magazine_ in 1833 or 1834. G. STEINMAN STEINMAN. _Grammar in relation to Logic_ (Vol. viii., p. 514).--MR. INGLEBY evidently has but a superficial view of this doctrine, which is not only Dr. Latham's, but one, I apprehend, pretty well known to every Oxford undergraduate, viz. that, logically, _conjunctions connect propositions, not words_. By way of proving the falsity of it (which he says is demonstrable), he bids Dr. Latham "resolve this sentence: _All men are either two-legged, one-legged, or no-legged_:" and adds, "It cannot be done." I may inform him that the three categorical propositions, "A man is two-legged, or he is {630} one-legged, or he is no-legged," connected by their several copulas, are equivalent to and co-extensive with the disjunctive proposition which he instances. MR. INGLEBY quotes Boole's _Mathematical (?) Analysis of Logic_ in support of his opinion; but, from the following specimen of that work, it does not appear to be much of an authority. The author says: