"'And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, that ye which have followed me (in the _regeneration_, when the Son of Man shall sit upon the throne of his glory), ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.' Here regeneration _is not to be understood in the same sense as the new birth or regeneration mentioned by our Saviour_ (John iii.), from whence the new birth is to be derived and stated; but, as I before observed, must be referred to a literal restoration to life, _i. e_. either to the general resurrection, or rather to the Millennium, when Christ is to reign upon earth over the Saints for a thousand years, after the dissolution of the present form of it. I make no doubt that this latter opinion is the genuine sense of the text I have quoted from St. Matthew; and consequently, that regeneration, _in this passage_, is to be applied to the first resurrection of the dead, or to the supposed Millennium."--Pp. 67, 68. The above will show that Thomas Whiston did not "_maintain_ that regeneration is a literal and physical being born again," in the sense which the passage quoted by J. T. conveys. I have not seen Taylor's work with the date 1746. As the name is common, and the pamphlets and sermons of that time on original sin are innumerable, many Taylors may have written besides the one mentioned by [Greek: Halieus]. J. T.'s Taylor cannot be excused even on the ground of having read only a part of the book he misrepresented: for he refers to p. 68., from which he must have seen that Thomas Whiston there explained only an isolated passage. H. B. C. Garrick Club. * * * * * HELMETS. (Vol. viii., p. 538.) The following observations upon the helmet, by Stephen Martin Leake, Esq., Garter, may be acceptable to your querist S. N.