Notes and Queries, Number 240, June 3, 1854: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. — John Shaqi
Notes and Queries, Number 240, June 3, 1854: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Number 240, June 3, 1854: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
It appears however, by this letter, that on one occasion he trespassed
on some neighbour's game preserves, and received a hint on the subject:
Beriton, Nov. 16, 1758.
SIR,
As I am extremely well convinced of your politeness, and your readiness
to grant your {512} neighbours any reasonable liberty with regard to
country sports, so I should be very sorry if either myself or my
servants had taken any improper ones.
I am no sportsman, Sir, and was as much tempted this morning by the
beauty of the day and the pleasure of the ride as by the hopes of any
sport. I went out, and, neither acquainted with the bounds of the
manors nor your request to the neighbouring gentlemen, could only
follow my groom where he led me. I quitted your manor the instant I
received your message, without having killed anything in it. I assure
you that you shall never have again the same subject of complaint. With
regard to the liberty you are so good as to grant me for other sports,
I return you my most humble thanks, but shall not make much use of it,
as there are still in my father's manor more game than would satisfy so
moderate a sportsman as myself.
My father would be extremely angry if his servants had destroyed any of
your game; but they all assure him they have killed no one hare upon
your liberties. As to pheasants, they have only killed one this season,
and that in Inwood copse.
I am,
Sir,
Your obedient humble servant,
E. GIBBON, Junior.
E. G. F. S.
* * * * *
BOHN'S "ORDERICUS VITALIS."
In looking through the pages of _Ordericus Vitalis_, vol. ii. (Bohn's
edition), I have noticed some trifling inaccuracies, to one or more of
which you will perhaps suffer me to call the editor's attention through the
medium of "N. & Q.," in case he be not already aware of them.
At p. 70. King William is described as offering the bishopric of Mans to
"Samson, _Bishop_ of Bayeux, his chaplain." So in the index to _Histor.
Anglic. circa tempus Conquestûs, &c., a Francisco Maseres_, I find this
passage of Vitalis referred to under the title of "Sanson Baiocensis
_episcopus_."
But yet Odo was Bishop of Bayeux at this time; and notwithstanding what
Marbode _afterwards_ said of Bayeux, when he invited his old pupil to meet
him there, viz. "Sedes præsulibus sufficit illa tribus," yet Samson, even
then, was not Bishop of Bayeux, but of Worcester.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account