in form and appearance, that the variations throughout can only be detected by placing them in juxtaposition. They are all neatly printed, without a black line between the columns, and make thicker volumes than the genuine edition. I have never been able to verify the tradition that the Field's Bible, 1653, was printed for the army by order of Cromwell. It is the only one, as far as I can discover, 'Printed by John Field, Printer to the Parliament.' I received the tradition from my father nearly sixty years ago, and have no doubt but that it is founded in fact. It is an inquiry well worthy of investigation.--G. OFFOR."] _Canne's Bible._--What is the value of a good copy of Canne's Bible, printed at Edinburgh by John Kincaid, 1756? SIGMA. ["Canne's Bibles were first printed at Amsterdam, 1647, 1662, and 1664; in London, 1682, 1684, 1698: these are all pocket volumes. Then again in Amsterdam, 4to., 1700. At Edinburgh by Watkins in 1747, and by Kincaid in 1766; after which there followed editions very coarsely and incorrectly printed. They are all, excepting that of 1647, in my collection. Kincaid's, 1766, 2 vols. nonpareil, in beautiful condition, bound in green morocco, cost me five shillings. That of 1747, by Watkins, not in such fine condition, two shillings. SIGMA can readily imagine the value of Kincaid's edition 1756, by comparison with those of 1747 and 1766. If any of your readers could assist me to procure the first edition, 1647, I should be greatly obliged.--G. OFFOR."] _Dryden and Luke Milbourne._--Among the "Quarrels of Authors," I do not find that between _glorious John_ and this reverend gentleman. In a poetical paraphrase of _The Christian's Pattern_, by the latter (8vo., 1697), he shows unmistakeable evidence of having been lately skinned by the _witty tribe_, which I take to mean Dryden and his _atheistical crew_. I am aware that Milbourne invited the attack by his flippant remarks upon the English Virgil, but I know not in which piece of Dryden's to look for it. J. O.