Notes and Queries, Number 39, July 27, 1850 — John Shaqi
Notes and Queries, Number 39, July 27, 1850Various
History
Notes and Queries, Number 39, July 27, 1850
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
"This Catholicke Treatise, which I have hope to see ere it be
long, and if it come in time, I may chance by some appendix, to
give you more notice of the particulars."
In the conclusion (cap. xiii. §ix. p. 553.):--
"And now at this very instant having written hitherto, cometh to
my handes the Catholicke Treatise itselfe of _Equivocation_
before meneyoned," &c.... "Albeit the whole Treatise itselfe be
not large, nor conteyneth above 8 or 9 sheetes of written
paper."
And (§ xi. p. 554.):--
"Of ten chapters he omitteth three without mention."
I.B.
* * * * *
FURTHER NOTES ON THE DERIVATION OF THE WORD "NEWS."
I have too much respect for the readers of "NOTES AND QUERIES" to
consider it necessary to point out _seriatim_ the false conclusions
arrived at by MR. HICKSON, at page 81.
The origin of "news" may now be safely left to itself, one thing at
least being certain--that the original purpose of introducing the
subject, that of disproving its alleged derivation from the points of
the compass, is fully attained. No person has come forward to defend
_that_ derivation, and therefore I hope that the credit of expunging
such a fallacy from books of reference will hereafter be due to "NOTES
AND QUERIES".
I cannot avoid, however, calling Mr. Hickson's attention to one or two
of the most glaring of his _non-sequiturs_.
I quoted the Cardinal of York to show that in his day the word "newes"
was considered plural. MR. HICKSON quotes _me_ to show that in the
present day it is used in the singular; therefore, he thinks that the
Cardinal of York was wrong: but he must pardon me if I still consider
the Cardinal an unexceptional authority as to the usage of his own time.
MR. HICKSON asserts that "odds" is not an English word; he classifies it
as belonging to a language known by the term "slang," of which he
declares his utter disuse. And he thinks that when used at all, the word
is but an ellipsis for "_odd chances_." This was not the opinion of the
great English lexicographer, who describes the word as--
"Odds; a noun substantive, from the adjective odd."
and he defines its meaning as "inequality," or incommensurateness. He
cites many examples of its use in its various significations, with any
of which MR. HICKSON's substitution would play strange pranks; here is
one from Milton:--
"I chiefly who enjoy
So far the happier lot, enjoying thee
Pre-eminent by so much odds."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account