Notes and Queries, Number 64, January 18, 1851 — John Shaqi
Notes and Queries, Number 64, January 18, 1851Various
History
Notes and Queries, Number 64, January 18, 1851
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
I hope that some competent observer may inform us of what animals these and
the lindwurm at Bruenn are the remains.
It has struck me as possible that the real history of these crocodiles or
alligators, if they are such, may be, that they were brought home by
crusaders as specimens of dragons, just as Henry the Lion, Duke of
Brunswick, brought from the Holy Land the antelope's horn which had been
palmed upon {41} him as a specimen of a griffin's claw, and which may still
be seen in the cathedral of that city. That they should afterwards be
fitted with appropriate legends, is not surprising.
Some years since, when walking down the valley of St. Nicholas, on the
south side of the Valais, my guide, a native of the valley, pointed out to
me a wood on the mountain side, and told me that therein dwelt great
serpents, about 24 feet long, which carried off lambs from the pastures. He
had, however, never seen one of these monsters, but had only seen those who
had, and I failed in procuring any testimony of a more decisive character.
My guide, however, affirmed that their existence was generally believed in
the valley.
N.
* * * * *
ORIGIN OF THE FAMILY NAME OF BACON.
(Vol. ii., p. 247.)
The Query proposed by NOCAB evidently possesses some interest, having
already elicited two or three replies. I trust, therefore, I shall be
excused for submitting yet another solution, which appears to me more
satisfactory, if not _conclusive_. The answers to such questions are for
the most part merely ingenious _conjectures_; but these to be of weight,
should be supported by antiquarian learning. They claim perhaps more regard
when they seem to elucidate collateral difficulties; but are of most value
when _authenticated_ by independent evidence, especially the evidence of
_documents_ or of _facts_. Fortunately, in the case before us, all these
desiderata are supplied.
Old Richard Verstegan, famous for Saxon lore and archaeological research,
explains it thus:--
"Bacon, _of the Beechen tree_, anciently called BUCON; and, whereas
swinesflesh is now called by the name of BACON, it grew only at the
first unto such as were fatted with BUCON or _beechmast_."--Chap. ix.
p. 299.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account