(33.) In what way can we detect the propounder of the _Notabilis expositio super canonem misse_? His work is of small folio size without mention of place or year; but it certainly proceeded from Nuremberg, and was it not one of the _primitiae_ of Creusner? (34.) Who is designated by the letters "G. N. N. D.," which are put at the head of the Epistle to Zuinglius, _De Magistris nostris Lovaniensibus, quot et quales sint_? And why has the _Vita S. Nicolai, sive Stultitiae Exemplar_, originally attached to this performance, been omitted by Dr. Muench in his edition of the _Epistolae obscurorum Vivorum, aliaque aevi decimi sexti Monimenta rarissima_, Leipzig, 1827? If he had reprinted this very desirable appendix, it would have furnished him with the date "Anno M.D.XX.," which would have prevented him from assigning this satirical composition to the year "1521." (Einl. p. 408.) (35.) A student can scarcely be considered moderately well versed in ancient ecclesiastical documents who has neither read nor heard of the _Somnium Viridarii_; and we may wonder at, and pity, the learned Goldast, for having fallen into the extravagant mistake of attributing this Latin translation of the celebrated Dialogue, _Le Songe du Verger_, to "Philotheus Achillinus, Consiliarius Regius." (_Monarch. S. Rom. Imper_. i. 58. Hanov. 1612.) The question arises, How was he misled? Was it not through a strange misconception of a sentence in the _Silva Nuptialis_ of Nevizan, to which he refers in his preliminary "Dissertatio de Auctoribus?" This writer, who has been plentifully purified by the Roman _Index_, had cited the preface of an Italian poem, "Il Viridario," composed by his contemporary, Giovanni FILOTEO ACHILLINI; and is it thus that an author of the sixteenth century has got credit for an anonymous achievement of the fourteenth age? Goldastus has hardly been out-Heroded by those who have devised an individual named _Viridarius_, or "Le Sieur _du Vergier_." (See Baillet, _Deguisemens des Auteurs_, p. 479., and M. De la Monnoye's note, pp. 501-2.) (36.) Is there not a transpositional misprint in the colophon of the old German _Life of S. Dorothea_, the so-called patroness of Prussia? For it would seem to be inevitable that we should endeavour to elicit 1492, and not 1512, from the following date: "Den Dingstag nach Gregory als man tzelete, M.CCCC. unde cxii." (Vid. Lilienthal, _Histor. B. Doroth_. p. 6. Dantisc., 1744.) (37.):-- "The Original Manuscript of both volumes of this History will be deposited in the Cotton Library, by "T. BURNETT." Has this declaration been inserted, in the handwriting of Thomas Burnet, on the reverse of the title-page of the second volume, in all large-paper copies (and is it strictly limited to them?) of Bishop Burnet's _History of his own Time_, Lond., 1734? Compare the printed "Advertisement to the Reader" in the first volume, published in 1724.