Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 101, October 4, 1851: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 101, October 4, 1851: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
"It appears by the communications from the stewards of the late
Mr. Sawkins, that his customary descent is extended to younger
brothers in the manors of--
"Surrey.
Dorking, in Dorking and Capel-Milton and Westcott, in the parishes
of Dorking Capel and Ockley
"To all collateral males in the manors of--
"Middlesex.
Isleworth Syon
Ealing, otherwise Zealing
Acton
"To females, as well as males, lineal and collateral, in the
manors of--
"Middlesex.
Fulham
Wimbledon, including Putney, Mortlake, Rochampton, and Sheen
"Surrey.
Battersea and Wandsworth
Downe
Barnes
Richmond
"Nottinghamshire.
Southwell
"Hertfordshire.
Much Hadham."
G. R. C.
Southwark, Sept. 24, 1851.
The accompanying extract is from the History of the borough of Stafford,
in White's _Directory and Gazetteer of Staffordshire_, which is just
published:--
"The ancient custom of _Borough-English_ formerly prevailed here,
by which the youngest son succeeded to property, as heir-at-law,
in preference to the elder children. The origin of this part of
our common law is not very well ascertained, but it is generally
supposed to have arisen from the ancient system of _vassalage_,
which gave the lord of the manor certain rights over his _vassal's
bride_, and thus rendered the legitimacy of the eldest born
uncertain; or perhaps it may have originated in the natural
presumption, that the youngest child was least capable of
providing for itself."
F. J. M.
PASSAGE IN VIRGIL.
(Vol. iv., pp. 24. 88.)
Permit me to make a few remarks on the passage of Virgil, "Viridesque
secant," &c., and its attempted elucidation, Vol. iv., pp. 88, 89.
It is stated that the translation is not correct, and also that Servius
was a very illiterate, ignorant, and narrow-minded man, &c.
In the short notice of Servius and his works in the _Penny Cyclopædia_,
we have a very different character of him. Which is to be believed, for
both cannot be right?
Harles, in his _Introd. in Notitiam Lit. Rom._, speaks thus of the
_Commentaries of Servius_:
"Quæ in libris Virgilii sub nomine Servii circumferuntur Scholia,
eorum minima pars pertinet ad illum; sed farrago est ex
antiquioribus commentariis Cornuti, Donati, &c., et aliorum; immo
vero ex recentioris ætatis interpretibus multa adjecta sunt et
interpolata."
Thus condemning the interpolations, but leaving intact the matter really
belonging to Servius.
For a refutation of the impertinent comparison with a Yorkshire hedge
schoolmaster, and the erroneous appreciation of the _Commentaries_, I
must refer to the above-mentioned notice in the _Penny Cyclopædia_.
In the next place, with respect to the meaning of the passage:--the word
_seco_, when applied to the movements of ships, is usually rendered by
"sulco;" _e.g._:
"Jamque fretum Minyæ Pegasæâ puppe secabant."
Ovid, _Met._ vii. 1.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account