Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 104, October 25, 1851: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 104, October 25, 1851: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
Mûsu têvs debbesîs, svêtîts lai tôp tavs vârds, lai nâk tava valstiba;
tavs prâts lai noteek, ka debbesîs ta arridzan zemmes virzû; mûsû
deeni[=s]ku maiz dôd mums [=s]odeen; un pametti mums mûsu parradus, ka
arrimês pamettam saveem parradneekeem; un ne ceveddi mûs eek[=s]
kârdina[=s]anas, bet atpesti mûs no ta launa.
MONUMENTAL BUST OF SHAKSPEARE.
Mr. T. Kite, the parish clerk of Stratford-on-Avon, has recently
completed a copy in imitation stone from a cast of the monumental bust
of Shakspeare, which appears to me, after a very close and minute
comparison, to be a far more faithful transcript of the original than
any of the kind hitherto accessible to the public. It gives in detail
most accurately those peculiarities which led Sir F. Chantrey to the
opinion that the artist worked from a cast made after death; and if you
would kindly spare a few lines of your paper for a paragraph to that
effect, I feel sure you would not only confer a benefit on Shakspearian
collectors, but at the same time pay a just tribute to Mr. Kite, for the
intelligent pains he has bestowed upon the work. It is scarcely
necessary to say an accurate copy of the Stratford bust is the best
memorial of Shakspeare the public can possess, it being so much superior
in authenticity to any other resemblance.
J. O. HALLIWELL.
Stratford on Avon, Oct. 15.
NOTES ON PASSAGES IN VIRGIL.
I. "Acti Fatis."--_Virg. Æn. I. 36._
"Si _fatis_, nulla Junonis invidia est. Si Junonis invidiâ
fatigabantur quomodo dicit _acti fatis_? Sed hoc ipsum Junonis
odium fatale est. Agebantur _fatis_ Junonis, i.e. _voluntate_; vel
_fatis_, pro _malis_, ut iii. 182."--SERVIUS.
"Non tam quoniam hoc Junonis odium fatale erat, ut Servius; sed
potius, quoniam hi ipsi Trojanorum, errores fatales
erant."--HEYNE.
Not only these two, but all other commentators and translators, as far
as I know, have wholly mistaken the meaning of this passage, which is
not _that the Trojans were_ jactati, fatigati, or agitati, _harassed, or
driven hither and thither by the fates_, (_actus_ being never used in
the sense assigned to it in such interpretation), but simply that they
were _driven onward, or toward Latium, by the fates_ (acti fatis); while
at the same time they were _driven backward, or from Latium, by Juno_,
(arcebat longe Latio). The result was "multos per annos errabant maria
omnia circum:" words could not more clearly express the opposition of
the forces between which the Trojans were placed; an opposition on which
hangs the whole action of the poem. The _invidia_ of Juno, concerning
which Servius queries, was manifested by her using her utmost exertions
to prevent the Trojans from arriving at the place toward which they were
impelled by the fates, _i.e._ at which it was fated they should arrive.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account