Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 105, November 1, 1851: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 105, November 1, 1851: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
That gallant gentleman, Captain Sword, whose good services we readily
acknowledge, has hitherto monopolized all the honours which the
sovereign has thought proper to distribute. We would fain see good
Master Pen now take his fair share of them;[1] and the present moment,
when Peace has just celebrated her Jubilee in the presence of admiring
millions, is surely the fittest moment that could be selected for the
establishment of some Order (call it of Victoria, or Civil Merit, or
what you will) to honour those followers of the Arts of Peace to whose
genius, learning, and skill the great event of the year 1851 owes its
brilliant conception, its happy execution, its triumphant success.
[Footnote 1: We are glad to find that the views we have here
advocated, have the support of the leading journal of Europe. Vide
_The Times_ of Wednesday last.]
The reign of the Illustrious Lady who now fills with so much dignity the
Throne of these Realms, has happily been pre-eminently distinguished
(and long may it be so!) by all unexampled progress made in all the Arts
of Peace. Her Majesty has been pre-eminently a Patron of all such Arts.
How graceful then, on the part of Her Majesty, would be the immediate
institution of an Order of Civil Merit! How gratifying to those
accomplished and worthy men on whom Her Majesty might be pleased to
confer it!
Notes.
DANIEL DEFOE AND THE "MERCATOR."
Wilson, in his _Life of Defoe_, vol. iii. p. 334., gives an account from
Tindal, Oldmixon, Boyer, and Chalmers, of the _Mercator_ and its
antagonist, the _British Merchant_. He commences by observing that Defoe
"had but little to do with this work" (the _Mercator_), and quotes
Chalmers, who seems totally to mistake the passage in Defoe's _Appeal to
Honour and Justice_, pp. 47-50., in which the _Mercator_ is mentioned,
and to consider it as a denial on his part of having had any share in
the work. Defoe's words are--
"What part I had in the _Mercator_ is well known, and would men
answer with argument and not with personal abuse, I would at any
time defend any part of the _Mercator_ which was of my writing.
But to say the _Mercator_ is mine is false. I never was the author
of it, nor had the property, printing, or profit of it. I had
never any payment or reward for writing any part of it, nor had I
the power of putting what I would into it, yet the whole clamour
fell upon me."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account