Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 109, November 29, 1851: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 109, November 29, 1851: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
[These relate most probably to the palatine rights of the Bishops
of Durham, granted by Egfrid, King of Northumbria, in 685; when he
gave to St. Cuthbert all the land between the Wear and the Tyne,
called "the patrimony of St. Cuthbert," to hold in as full and
ample a manner as the king himself holds the same. This donative,
with its ancient customs and privileges, was confirmed by the
Danes, and afterwards by William the Conqueror; in addition to
which, the latter made the church a sanctuary, and the county a
palatinate. Its bishop was invested with as great a power and
prerogative within his see, as the king exercised without the
bounds of it, with regard to forfeitures, &c. Thus it was a kind
of royalty subordinate to the crown, and, by way of eminence, was
called _The Bishoprick_. For an account of the ancient customs
connected with the cathedral, our correspondent is referred to the
curious and interesting work of Davies of Kidwelly, entitled, _The
Ancient Rites and Monuments of the Monastical and Cathedral Church
of Durham_, 12mo. 1672, which has been republished by the Surtees
Society.]
Replies.
CONVOCATION OF YORK.
(Vol. iv., p. 368.)
This body (of which I am a member) ought to meet on the same occasions
with that of Canterbury; but owing to the neglect or the wilfulness of
its officials, many omissions and mistakes occur. I have heard a
commission to _further_ adjourn the Convocation, from a day to which it
previously stood adjourned, read the day _after_ that on which it ought
to have assembled, but which day had arrived and passed without any one
recollecting the fact! Our Convocation appears at no time to have acted
a very prominent part, though its constitution is far better fitted for
a working synod than that of the southern province. In the latter the
_parochial_ clergy are so inadequately represented as to be much
outnumbered by the _dignitaries_ appointed by the crown and the bishops;
but in York there are _two_ proctors chosen by the clergy of _each_
archdeaconry and peculiar jurisdiction, and _two_ by each cathedral
chapter; thus affording a complete counterpoise to the deans and
archdeacons who are members _ex officio_. Another peculiarity in the
Convocation of York is, that it assembles in _one_ house, the bishops
commonly appearing by their proxies (priests), and the archbishop
presiding by his commissioner, who is always the dean, or one of the
residentiary canons of York.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account