Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 88, July 5, 1851: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. — John Shaqi
Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 88, July 5, 1851: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 88, July 5, 1851: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
"Having in obedience to his Majesty's will signified thus much
unto you, I shall not doubt of that your ready compliance; and the
rather because his Majesty intends to send the same injunctions
very speedily to the University of Oxford, whom I am assured you
will equal in all other excellencies, and so in obedience to the
king; especially when his commands are so much to the honour and
esteem of that renowned University, whose welfare is so heartily
desired, and shall ever be endeavoured by, Mr. Vice-Chancellor,
"Your loving friend and Chancellor,
"MONMOUTH."
I believe this letter, or something like it, was published by Peck in
his _Desiderata Curiosa_, and also by Mr. Roberts in his _Life of
Monmouth_. The transcript I send you was made from a copy in the
handwriting of Dr. Birch in the _Additional MS._ 4162., fo. 230.
JOHN BRUCE.
The following passage occurs in Rutt's _Diary of Thomas Burton_, 4
vols.: Colburn, 1828. I have not the work at hand, but from a MS.
extract from the same, believe it may be found as a note by the editor
in vol. i. p. 359.
"Burnet was always an extempore preacher. He says that reading is
peculiar to this nation, and cannot be induced in any other. The
only discourse he ever wrote beforehand was a thanksgiving sermon
before the queen in 1705. He never before was at a pause in
preaching. It is contrary to a university statute, obsolete,
though unrepealed."
C. H. P.
Brighton, June 27.
LORD MAYOR NOT A PRIVY COUNCILLOR.
(Vol. iii., p. 496.)
This Query, and your answer, involve one or two important questions,
which are worth a fuller solution than you have given.
The Lord Mayor is no more a Privy Councillor than he is Archbishop of
Canterbury. The title of "Right Honourable," which has given rise to
that vulgar error, is in itself a mere courtesy appended to the title of
"Lord;" which is also, popularly, though not _legally_, given him: for
in all _his own_ acts, he is designated officially as "Mayor" only. The
courtesy-title of _Lord_ he shares with the Mayors of Dublin and York,
the Lord-Advocate of Scotland, the younger sons of Dukes and Marquises,
&c. &c., and all such _Lords_ are styled by courtesy "Right Honourable;"
and this style of _Right Honourable_ is also given to Privy Councillors
in virtue of their proper official title of "Lords of Her Majesty's Most
Honourable Privy Council." So, the "Right Honourable the Lords of the
Treasury and Admiralty." So much for the title. The fact stated in the
Editor's answer, of the admission of the Lord Mayor _to the Council
Chamber_ after some clamour, on the accession of William IV., is a
mistake arising out of the following circumstances. On the demise of the
crown, a London Gazette Extraordinary is immediately published, with a
proclamation announcing the death of one sovereign and the accession of
the other. This proclamation styles itself to be that of the--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account