Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 90, July 19, 1851: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 90, July 19, 1851: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
"Ce bassin sert de décharge à la fontaine, qui a donné, dit-on,
son nom à Fontainebleau. Elle est nommée, dans les anciennes
chartes, _Fons Blaudi_. Quelques modernes substituent à cette
étymologie celle de _belle eau_, d'où ils font également dériver
Fontainebleau. L'une et l'autre sont rejetées par Expilly, et
remplacées par une troisième de sa façon, qui est évidente, selon
lui, et qui, selon ses lecteurs, est la plus absurde de toutes. Je
vais citer ce passage pour faire sentir jusqu'à quel travers
d'esprit peut conduire la manie des étymologies. 'Pourquoi,'
dit-il, 'se donner la torture à ce sujet? Il suffit de la moindre
notion de la chasse pour savoir que, quand le chasseur appellè les
chiens, il crie: _Thia hillaut!_ N'est-il pas vraisemblable que le
château ayant été bâti en pays de chasse, les habitans des
environs, entendant continuellement le mot _hillaut_,
l'appellèrent de ce nom, auquel ils joignirent celui de la
fontaine près de laquelle il avait été bâti. De _Fontaine hillaut_
on fit insensiblement Fontainebleau.'"
TWO Queries suggest themselves here. Who or what was _Blaudus_ or
_Blaudum_? Is our _Tally-ho_ derived from _Thia hillaut_, or _vice
versâ_? As to the "travers d'esprit," so gravely imputed to Expilly, it
is clear to me that his solution of the matter must be taken as a
burlesque on etymologists, rather than as any evidence of his own
extravagance in that respect.
HENRY H. BREEN.
St. Lucia, June, 1851.
FORCE OF CONSCIENCE.
The following relation has often been reprinted in religious magazines
and the like. It is given by Dr. Fordyce, Professor of Philosophy at
Aberdeen, in his _Dialogues concerning Education_ (London, 1748, vol.
ii. p. 401.), as "a true story, _which happened in a neighbouring state
not many years ago_." Can any of your readers furnish me with Dr. F.'s
authority for the assertion?--the Doctor himself gives none. One would
think that, if true, its truth might be easily verified. If its truth
cannot be satisfactorily established, to reprint such tales cannot but
be most mischievous:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account