Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 96, August 30, 1851: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 96, August 30, 1851: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
Our present purpose, however, is to call attention to a hint
thrown out not only in the following Note addressed to ourselves
(which, be it observed, has been in type for several weeks), but
also in the pages of our learned and able contemporary the
GENTLEMAN'S MAGAZINE, in an article from which we extract the most
important passage, namely, that in the event of the failure of the
projected Caxton Memorial, the funds subscribed might with
propriety and good effect be applied (the consent of the
subscribers being of course first obtained) to an object with
which Caxton himself would so surely have sympathised, namely, the
restoration of the tomb of Geoffrey Chaucer:
_Chaucer and Caxton._--"Not half" of the required 100_l._ "has yet been
subscribed" for the restoration of Chaucer's monument. Chaucer was an
especial favourite of Caxton; and as the first English printer seems for
awhile destined to remain without "light and fountain," as once upon a
time suggested by Dr. Milman, treasurer of the Caxton fund, possibly the
subscribers to that fund would not object to the transmission of the sum
required by the old monument of the poet, from the no monument of the
printer? Will the Dean of St. Paul's ask for suffrages on the matter?
Q.
After alluding to the various proposals for the Caxton Memorial,
and the correspondence between MR. BOLTON CORNEY and MR. BERIAH
BOTFIELD in "NOTES AND QUERIES," Sylvanus Urban proceeds:
"But the discussion will do good. If neither proposal can be carried
out, we shall probably have a better suggestion than either. The money
in hand is said to be _far short_ of the sum necessary to erect a statue
or to print the works; if so, why not repair Chaucer's tomb with it?
Nothing would be more agreeable to Caxton himself. He not only printed
Chaucer's works, and re-imprinted them merely to get rid of errors; but,
feeling that the great poet 'ought eternally to be remembered' in the
place where he lies buried, he hung up an epitaph to his memory over
that tomb which is now mouldering to decay.
"'Post obitum Caxton voluit te vivere, cura
Willelmi, Chaucer clare poeta, tui,
Nam tua, non solum, compressit opuscula formis,
Has quoque sed laudes jussit hic esse tuas.'
"The epitaph, touching evidence of Caxton's affection for the poet, has
disappeared. In a few years the tomb itself will have submitted to
inevitable fate. What better mode of keeping alive the memory of both
Chaucer and Caxton, or of doing honour to the pious printer, than by
showing that even after the lapse of centuries his wishes for the
preservation of Chaucer's memory in that place are not forgotten? If the
fund is more than sufficient for the purpose, the surplus might be
invested on trust to perform the wish of Caxton, by keeping Chaucer's
monument in repair for ever."--_Gentleman's Magazine_, August, p. 167.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account