Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 117, January 24, 1852: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 117, January 24, 1852: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
"I have been informed that this mill was where Seel, or Seal Mill
is now, at the end of Hertford town, towards Stevenage; and that
an adjoining meadow is still called Paper-mill Mead. This Seel
Mill, so denominated from the adjoining hamlet, was erected in the
year 1700; and is noted for being the first that made the finest
flour, known by the name of _Hertfordshire White_. It stands upon
the river Bean, in the middle of three acres of meadow land,
called Paper-mill Mead, so denominated in the charter of King
Charles I. to the town of Hertford for the fishery of a certain
part of that river. Hence, perhaps, some have thought it was at
Stevenage, but there is no water for a mill at or even near that
place."
The French authorities are particularly unhappy on the subject of the
introduction of the art of paper-making in England. According to the
_Dictionnaire de la Conversation_, "la première manufacture, établie à
_Gertford_ en Angleterre, est de 1588;" while the _Encyclopédie des Gens
du Monde_ asserts that "la première patererie de chiffons qu'eu notre
pays fut établie en 1312; celle d'Angleterre en 1388."
A. GRAYAN.
THE PENDULUM DEMONSTRATION.
(Vol. iv., pp. 129. 177. 235. 277.)
Since my last communication on this subject (Vol. iv., p. 235.) I have
been engaged in examining the theory, and the experiments connected with
it, somewhat more closely; and, in the meanwhile, I abstain from
replying to the last observations of A. E. B. (Vol. iv., p. 277.)
A. E. B. says it was "uncourteous" in me to call the theory which he put
forward _his_ theory. I beg pardon for the offence. I intended by the
expression merely to indicate the particular theory which he advocated.
I believe its author is M. Chesles. The theory in question is:
"That the variation of the pendulum's plane is due to the excess
of velocity with which one extremity of the line of oscillation
may be affected more than the other."
I ventured to pronounce this to be untenable, and begged A. E. B. to
"reduce it to paper." Upon this he remarked:
"H. C. K. is surely not so unphilosophical as to imagine that a
theory, to be true, must be palpable to the senses. If the element
of increase exist at all, however imperceptible in a single
oscillation, repetition of effect must eventually make it
observable. But I shall even gratify H. C. K., and inform him,
that the difference in linear circumference between two such
parallels in the latitude of London, would be about 50 feet; so
that the northern end of a 10 feet rod, placed horizontally in the
meridian, would travel less by that number of feet in twenty-four
hours, than the southern end. This, so far from being inadequate,
is greatly _in excess_ of the alleged apparent motion in the place
of the pendulum's vibration."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account