Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 121, February 21, 1852: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. — John Shaqi
Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 121, February 21, 1852: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 121, February 21, 1852: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
Josephus had merely heard this reported, as is evident from his use of
the words "it is said." Pausanias, in the _Tour in Greece_ (vii. 26.
6.), has the following observation:--
"A village called Donussa, between Ægira and Pellene, belonging to
the Sicyonians, was destroyed by that people. Homer, _say they_,
remembered this town in his epic, in the enumeration of the people
of Agamemnon, 'Hyperesia then, and Donoessa, rocky town' (Ιλ.
β. 573.); but when Peisistratos collected the torn and widely
scattered songs of Homer, either he himself, or one of his
friends, altered the name through ignorance."
Wolf also makes use of this report, liable to the same objections as the
above, as one of his proofs. It is even doubtful whether Peisistratos
did edit Homer at all; but, under any circumstances, it was not the
first edition;[6] for is not Solon represented as the reviser of the
Homeric poems?
[Footnote 6: Granville Penn, _On the primary Arrangement of the
Iliad_; and Appendix B to Mure, vol. i.]
Cicero (_de Oratore_, III. 34.) says:
"Who is _traditionally_ reported to have had more learning at that
time, or whose eloquence received greater ornaments from polite
literature than that of Peisistratos? who _is said to have been_
the first that arranged the books of Homer, from their confused
state, into that order in which we at present enjoy them."
This also is produced as a proof by Wolf, though, for the same reason,
it is doubtful. But see Wolf's principal inaccuracies ably enumerated
and exposed by Clinton (_F.H._, i. p. 370.).
Such is the far-famed theory of Wolf, which, as most modern scholars
agree, is only calculated "to conduct us to most preposterous
conclusions."[7] And this last dictum of Othello's, Mr. Editor, reminds
me, that here it would not be preposterous to come to a conclusion for
the present, and to close my observations in another paper, where I
shall a theory "unfold," which, after the most patient consideration and
reconsideration, I am inclined to think the most approximative to the
truth.
[Footnote 7: _Othello_, Act I. Sc. 3.]
KENNETH R. H. MACKENZIE.
Feb. 16. 1852.
FOLK LORE.
_Fernseed._--I find in Dr. Jackson's works allusions to a superstition
which may interest some of your readers:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account