Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 122, February 28, 1852: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. — John Shaqi
Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 122, February 28, 1852: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.Various
History
Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 122, February 28, 1852: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc.
Various
Questions and answers -- Periodicals
"_An Essay towards a Proposal for Catholic Communion_; wherein
above sixty of the principal controverted points, which have
hitherto divided Christendom, being called over, 'tis examined how
many of them may, and ought to be laid aside, and how few remain
to be accommodated, for the effecting a general Peace. By a
Minister of the Church of England. Sold by John Nutt, near
Stationers' Hall, 1704."
This _Essay_ has passed through several editions in London and Dublin:
to that of 1801 is prefixed a
"Dedication to the Right Hon. the Lords Spiritual and Temporal,
and to the Hon. the House of Commons ... and the perusal of it
earnestly recommended by a Lover of Christian Peace and Union and
a Loyal United Briton."
It has now been in circulation for nearly a century and a half; and for
want of a medium of inter-communication in olden times like "N. & Q.,"
its authorship has frequently been a topic of keen discussion. Mr.
Oakeley, in his work, _The Subject of Tract XC. historically examined_,
states that
"Its publication attracted at the time the notice of the
Government. A warrant appears to have been issued from the
Secretary of State's office for the seizure of the author's
papers, and the arrest of his person, under a suspicion apparently
that he was in league with the Pretender."
It is to be regretted that Mr. Oakeley has not given his authority for
this statement. Mr. Goode, in his pamphlet entitled _Tract XC.
historically refuted_, attributes it, on the authority of Dodd, to
Thomas Dean, a Roman Catholic Fellow of University College, Oxford;
whereas the author of _The Sure Hope of Reconciliation_, p. 61., thinks
Mr. Goode's supposition open to exception; and as the writer styles
himself "A Minister of the Church of England," he is inclined to admit
his claim to the title, till stronger evidence be adduced to the
contrary.
The following curious colloquy between two priests of the Roman and
Anglican Churches, in the Town Hall at Guildford, in 1838, respecting
the authorship of this _Essay_, is also worthy a Note:
"_Rev. Joseph Sidden._ The author of _A Proposal for a Catholic
Communion_ says----
"_Rev. M. Hobart Seymour._ Name! name.
"_Rev. J. Sidden._ I do not know his name; he appears to have been
an archdeacon of the Church of England in the reign of Queen Anne.
His work is on sale at Booker's.
"_The Chairman._ Can you name the place of which he was
archdeacon?
"_Rev. J. Sidden._ No; but I give these as the words of a
Protestant clergyman.
"_Rev. M. H. Seymour._ You do not know that he was a Protestant at
all.
"_Rev. J. Sidden._ I have put the work into the hands of a
Protestant clergyman, who agrees with it; and it agrees with
Archbishop Bramhall. I have often tried to discover who was the
author.
"_Rev. M. H. Seymour._ It was written perhaps by a Roman Catholic
Priest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account