| ------------------------------ 2 | | 1 Sarah = George d'r. wife of widow Brough. George d'd Long of 7 July, Clapham 1846, Park æt. 39. Academy, 1846." [Footnote 5: Seventh in direct lineal male descent from the protomartyr.] E. D. _English Translation of the Canons_ (Vol. v., p. 246.).--The Queries of M. on this subject have arisen out of an error, which I fancy must be his own. After quoting the clause of the 36th Canon, _quodque eodem taliter uti liceat_, he says: "The English translation, to which subscription is now made, has the following rendering of the second clause: 'And that the same may be lawfully used.' The word 'taliter' seems to be not rendered at all." Of course I cannot tell on what authority he says this; but he is certainly wrong: for in the Oxford edition (1844) of the _Homilies and Canons_ this clause stands thus: "and that it may lawfully _so_ be used." And so it is printed in Hodgson's _Instructions_, p. 8., and in the Instructions to be observed by Candidates for Holy Orders in the Diocese of London: and I myself not long ago subscribed to it in this form. There is then no difference here at all; the Latin being rendered by the English, not only fully, but literally. I will only add, that the grammatical meaning of _taliter_, or _so_, appears to me in this place to be plain enough, without requiring a "theological controversy" to determine it. F. A. _"Arborei foetus alibi," &c._ (Vol. v., pp. 58. 189.).--I am afraid I did not make myself intelligible in my former communication. Certainly W. A. C. does not understand me. The question is, are we justified in translating _alibi atque_ "otherwhere than," in like manner as we translate _aliter atque_ "otherwise than?" W. A. C. takes for granted that the line in question refers to only one district. But that is the very point in doubt. The "head master's" translation makes it refer to two. W. S.