The Maxim of the Mean is the objective counter-part of the subjective
Principle of Moderation. The latter says: Don't over--, or
under-exercise any of your faculties; and the former says: Don't have
too much or too little of any thing. Too much of any thing is good for
nothing. Too little of it is worse than nothing. "Too much" and "too
little" are relative terms and signify nothing by themselves. It is only
with reference to oneself and one's environment at any particular time
and place that they acquire a meaning as "excess" and "defect"
respectively. I cannot explain it better than give a few instances in a
tabular form where the "mean" comes between the "excess" and the
"defect" of a quality of the head or heart, or a course of action.
(1) Qualities of the Head (Reason):--
_Excess. Mean. Defect._
Caution Prudence Neglect
Doubt Conviction Uncertainty
Conceit Modesty Diffidence
Sensitive Attentive Indifferent
(2) Qualities of the Heart (Passions):--
Cowardice Courage Rashness
Sensuality Temperance Abstinence
Bigot Enthusiastic Lukewarm
(3) Courses of Action:--
Restriction Liberty Licence
Flattery Courtesy Rudeness
Favouritism Justice Injustice
Prodigal Generous Miserly
You will find out for yourself what are the appropriate qualities or
courses of conduct, of which the excess, mean and defect are expressed
by the words given above. Fear, for example, is the feeling of which
excess is Cowardice and defect is Rashness, while the mean is Courage.
Similarly as regards one's own opinion of one's powers, excess is
Conceit and defect is Diffidence, while the mean is Modesty. Again too
much or too little restraint on action is Restriction or Licence while
the mean is Liberty.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account