Then there was the robbery at Orton Stanch.
The money taken by the woman there for tolls was brought to Peterborough
weekly, and one night the place was broken into and the cash box stolen.
There was a man called Jack Hall who had settled in this part of the
country, and was connected with others of Yaxley, who committed several
robberies in the district. Hall turned informer; he was arrested for
something else, and gave information, and Stretton and a man named
Humberston were taken separately. They were first allowed to see, but
not speak to, each other, and were put into separate cells. Mr. Preston,
who used to keep the lock-up at Fletton, locked the door of the passage
dividing the cells, but was careful to leave a policeman in the passage,
where he could hear any conversation between the prisoners. Towards
morning he heard one signal, the other “Hist! Jack, what are you in for?”
“The Stanch,” was the reply. The other said, “Jack Hall’s split upon
us.” “Never mind” was the answer, “we must deny it altogether.” This
conversation was proved at the trial at the assizes, and was relied upon
to confirm the evidence. The prisoners’ counsel complained of the way
these men had been trapped, but Lord Justice Campbell, who tried them,
pointed out that they were not asked to say what they did, and they were
convicted and sentenced to transportation for life.
One other case, the robbery at the Vicarage. The thief was met coming
away. He was described as a nice, gentlemanly looking man. A young
policeman met him in the street, and that thief had the impudence to walk
and talk to him. They walked up to the G.N. Station together, and the
policeman thinking no harm, the burglar got clear away, but he was
apprehended afterwards with others. There was a defence of an alibi set
up for one, and men were brought from Northampton to declare that he was
engaged at a tea garden there at the time. The jury did not believe
them. The same defence is one of the most common. If proved, it is, of
course, most conclusive, but it is very easy to set up this defence and
get it sworn to. It was once used by a man charged with stealing a
horse, who was found riding away upon its back. It occurs in Pickwick,
when Mr. Weller says: “Samivel, why wasn’t there an alibi?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account