Notes on the Bibliography of Yucatan and Central America: Comprising Yucatan, Chiapas, Guatemala (the Ruins of Palenque, Ocosingo, and Copan), and Oaxaca (Ruins of Mitla) — John Shaqi
Notes on the Bibliography of Yucatan and Central America: Comprising Yucatan, Chiapas, Guatemala (the Ruins of Palenque, Ocosingo, and Copan), and Oaxaca (Ruins of Mitla)Bandelier, Adolph Francis Alphonse
History
Notes on the Bibliography of Yucatan and Central America: Comprising Yucatan, Chiapas, Guatemala (the Ruins of Palenque, Ocosingo, and Copan), and Oaxaca (Ruins of Mitla)
Bandelier, Adolph Francis Alphonse
Central America -- Bibliography; Mayas -- Antiquities; Yucatán (Mexico : State) -- Bibliography
DOMINGO JUARREZ. "Compendio de la Historia de Guatemala." 1808-1818,
Guatemala. (Relies too much on Fuentes.) English translation by
Bailey. London, 1823. "A statistical and Commercial History of the
Kingdom of Guatemala, in Spanish America."--A second Spanish edition
appeared in 1857.
FRANCISCO DE PAULA GARCIA PELAEZ. (See Chiapas.).
"Memorias para la Historia del Antiguo Reyno de Guatemala." 1852.
CHARLES ETIENNE BRASSEUR DE BOURBOURG. "Popol Vuh. Le livre Sacré et
les Mythes de l'Antiquité Américaine, avec les livres Héroiques et
Historiques des Quichés." Paris, 1861.
Hardly any work of this century has created such a "mixed" sensation
of a serious nature, as this book.--It could be seen at a glance, that
no mystification was possible,--but there was a wide field open for
discussion on the point of origin, as far as the document itself, the
"Popol Vuh," was concerned.--Still the "sensation" has not resulted in
much active critical examination, and I think (If I may be permitted
to commit such a breach of modesty,) myself the only person attempting
a criticism of the "Popol Vuh" on the basis of documentary evidence.
Unfortunately, I was unable to prepare my annotations in time for the
publication of the 27th Volume of Proceedings of the American
Association for the Advancement of Science, in 1878.--Thus only the
text of "Sources for aboriginal history of Spanish America," appeared
without any documentary evidence attached.
One thing is evident, that the "Popol Vuh" was _written_. Now it is a
fact very easily proven, that the aborigines of Guatemala had no
phonetic alphabet whatever, consequently _that they did not
write_.--Therefore the "Popol Vuh" must have been composed, as an
instrument in writing, since the conquest; or after 1524.--This is
developed utterly independent of the fact that the document hints at
two data (p. 343,) indicating the time of its composition to have been
after 1550, and prior to 1600.--Therefore it was written in our
letters, or perhaps with the aid of the "five characters" invented by
Fray Francisco de la Parra, previous to 1560, to indicate sounds for
which our alphabet had no signs.--At all events, it was written in the
native Quiché idiom, and was only met with incidentally by Fray
Francisco Ximenez at the town of Chichicastenango, towards the close
of the 17th century.--This Dominican monk translated it into the
Spanish language and incorporated both text and translation in the
first volume of his "Historia de la provincia de predicadores,
&c."--according to Brasseur de Bourbourg's really silly and
irritatingly confused bibliography--(p. XIII., "Notice Bibliographique.")
Dr. Scherzer certainly deserves credit for having published a Spanish
text rendering approximatively the "Popol Vuh," in 1857, and there is no
doubt but that it is as correct a rendering of the original Quiché as the
French translation of Brasseur de Bourbourg.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account