Notes on the book of NumbersMackintosh, Charles Henry
Religion
Notes on the book of Numbers
Mackintosh, Charles Henry
Bible. Numbers -- Commentaries
Has this any voice for us? does it convey any great spiritual lesson to
our understanding? Assuredly it does. In the first place, it suggests
this important question to the reader: Can I declare my pedigree? It is
greatly to be feared there are hundreds, if not thousands, of professing
Christians who are wholly incompetent to do so. They cannot say, with
clearness and decision, “_Now are_ we the sons of God.” (1 John iii.
2.)—“Ye _are_ all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.... And
if ye are Christ’s, then _are_ ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to
the promise.” (Gal. iii. 26, 29.)—“For as many as are led by the Spirit
of God, they _are_ the sons of God.... The Spirit itself beareth witness
with our spirit, that we _are_ the sons of God.” (Rom. viii. 14, 16.)
This is the Christian’s “pedigree,” and it is his privilege to be able
to “declare” it. He is born from above—born again—born of water and the
Spirit, _i. e._, by the Word and by the Holy Ghost. (Compare diligently,
John iii. 5; Jas. i. 18; 1 Pet. i. 23; Eph. v. 26.) The believer traces
his pedigree directly up to a risen Christ in glory. This is Christian
genealogy. So far as our natural pedigree is concerned, if we trace
it up to its _source_, and then declare it honestly, we must see and
admit that we are sprung from a ruined stock. Ours is a fallen family.
Our fortunes are gone; our very blood attainted; we are irrecoverably
ruined; we can never regain our original position; our former _status_
and the inheritance which belonged to it are irretrievably lost. A man
may be able to trace his genealogical line through a race of nobles,
of princes, or of kings; but if he is fully to “declare his pedigree,”
he cannot stop short of a fallen, ruined, outcast head. We must get to
the _source_ of a thing to know what it really is. It is thus God looks
at and judges of things, and we must think with Him if we would think
aright. His judgment of men and things must be dominant forever. Man’s
judgment is only ephemeral, it lasts but for a day; and hence, according
to faith’s estimate, the estimate of sound sense, “it is a _small_
thing to be judged of man’s day.” (1 Cor. iv. 3.) Oh, how small! Would
that we felt more deeply how small a thing it is to be judged of man’s
judgment, or, as the margin reads it, of man’s day! Would that we walked
habitually in the real sense of the smallness thereof! It would impart a
calm elevation and a holy dignity which would lift us above the influence
of the scene through which we are passing. What is rank in this life?
What importance can attach to a pedigree which, if honestly traced and
faithfully declared, is derived from a ruined stock? A man can only be
proud of his birth when he stops short of his real origin—“born in sin
and shapen in iniquity.” Such is man’s origin—such his birth. Who can
think of being proud of such a birth—of such an origin? who but one whose
mind the god of this world hath blinded?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account