10. _Description of targets._—In paragraph 2 reference was made to the
necessity for a satisfactory working system for designating or
describing targets. One of our present embarrassments lies in the
multiplicity of methods and the incident confusion in the mind of the
soldier. Another source of error lies in the tendency of men to fancy
that the _ears_ of listening soldiers take in and digest a description
as rapidly as the _eye_ can travel from point to point. The ear, as
compared with the eye, is very slow. The immediate deduction from this
is that descriptions must be shorn of all unnecessary words, and that
they must be as simple and clear as possible. It also emphasizes the
advantage of following so far as practicable fixed methods of
expression. Recruits should be taught the general plan followed in
describing targets in order that they may waste no time from lack of
comprehension of the relation of the different elements of the
description or the terms employed.
The use of a single form will not suffice, since in some cases the
target is so evident that no mistake can be made, and the simple
designation such as “That troop of white-horse cavalry, range 1,000
yards,” will identify it beyond all question; while in other cases the
particular target may be so obscure and liable to confusion with other
targets that a reference point and some system of coordinates must be
employed.
In general, targets with reference to their designation will fall under
the following heads:
(_a_) Those that stand out so plainly that there can be no possibility
of doubt as the target meant.
(_b_) Those that are plainly visible, but are liable to be confused with
other targets of a similar nature and range.
(_c_) Those less distinctly visible and more difficult to pick up on
account of peculiar background, confusion with other objects, etc.
(_d_) Targets visible only through field glasses, and that may or may
not present the additional difficulties of danger of confusion with
other objects.
Case (_a_) has already been referred to. The system consists in the
simple announcement of: 1. The objective. 2. The range.
Ingenious people sometimes combine horizontal and vertical clock systems
in designating a target whenever possible to do so, but this is a
violation of the rule of simplicity and should never be done unless
evidently necessary. The mere fact that it is necessary or desirable to
use a reference point does not in all cases require use of both systems,
as the reference point may be so evident that no clock coordination is
necessary. When such designation _is_ necessary, the horizontal clock
face is used in coordinating the reference point and the vertical clock
face for locating the subsequent points.
11. Instruction in target description is simple but must be thoroughly
understood. An illustration by means of case (d) will cover the entire
subject so far as necessary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account