[2] A masterly short account of the various elements
which made up the fully developed doctrine of witchcraft
as it was held during the three centuries of especial
prosecution (1400-1700), and of the sources from which
these elements were derived, may be found in the first
chapter of Joseph Hansen’s Zauberwahn, Inquisition und
Hexenprozess im Mittelalter (Munich and Leipzig, 1900).
A learned and able essay by Professor George L. Burr,
The Literature of Witchcraft, reprinted from the Papers
of the American Historical Association, New York, 1890,
should also be consulted. Professor Burr emphasises the
sound and necessary distinction between witchcraft and
magic. But he seems to go too far in his insistence on
this distinction as vital in the history of witchcraft:
“Magic itself is actual and universal. But witchcraft never
was. It was but a shadow, a nightmare: the nightmare of a
religion, the shadow of a dogma. Less than five centuries
saw its birth, its vigor, its decay” (p. 238; p. 38 of
reprint). This statement is true if by witchcraft is meant
(and this is Professor Burr’s sense) the fully developed
and highly complicated system set forth in the Malleus
Maleficarum and in Del Rio’s Disquisitiones Magicae--what
Hansen (p. 35) calls “der verhängnisvolle Sammelbegriff des
Hexenwesens,”--which was not possible until scholasticism
had schematised the diversified elements of belief in
magic and demonology and sorcery and devil-worship which
Christian theology and Christian superstition had derived
from the most various sources--from Judaism, classical
antiquity, Neo-Platonism, and the thousand-and-one beliefs
of pagan converts. But, important as this fully developed
system was--and true though it may be that without the
schematising influence of scholastic philosophy the
witch-prosecution which was epidemic in Europe from
1400 to 1700 could hardly have taken place--we should
never forget that the essential element in witchcraft is
_maleficium_--the working of harm to the bodies and goods
of one’s fellow-men by means of evil spirits or of strange
powers derived from intercourse with such spirits. This
belief in _maleficium_ was once universal; it was rooted
and grounded in the minds of the people before they became
Christians; it is still the creed of most savages and
of millions of so-called civilised men. Throughout the
history of witchcraft (in whatever sense we understand
that word), it remained the ineradicable thing,--the
solid foundation, unshakably established in popular
belief, for whatever superstructure might be reared by the
ingenuity of jurisconsults, philosophers, theologians, or
inquisitors. Without this popular belief in _maleficium_,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account