"Nothing Between": The Special Doctrines Vindicated at the Reformation as Bearing upon the Spiritual Life of the ChurchHoare, Edward
Religion
"Nothing Between": The Special Doctrines Vindicated at the Reformation as Bearing upon the Spiritual Life of the Church
Hoare, Edward
Church of England -- Doctrines
I am often surprised that staunch Protestants appear sometimes to speak
with a certain measure of distrust of the Church Catechism, for there are
few documents which contain clearer, or more decisive, statements as to
great Protestant principles. What, _e.g._, can be clearer than the
definition given of a sacrament, “An outward and visible sign of an
inward and spiritual grace”? That definition teaches two truths—(1) That
the grace is inward and spiritual, and (2) That the sign is distinct from
it, being outward and visible. In that short sentence is contained one
of the great principles of the reformation. Rome had confused the sign
with the grace when it decreed that the whole substance of the elements
was changed into the whole substance of the body and blood of Christ, in
which case it is obvious the sign must cease to be a sign, being changed
into the thing signified. The Church of England taught, Article 28, that
such “transubstantiation was repugnant to the plain words of Scripture,
and overthroweth the nature of a sacrament.” Rome had decreed, “If any
one shall say that in the Eucharist Christ is received _only_ spiritually
(observe the _only_), let him be anathema.” The Church of England
replied, “The body of Christ is given, taken, and eaten in the supper
_only_ after an heavenly and spiritual manner.” Rome said, “If any one
shall say that faith _alone_ is a sufficient preparation for receiving
the Lord’s Supper, let him be anathema.” The Church of England replied,
“The mean,” _i.e._, the only mean “whereby the Body of Christ is received
and eaten in the supper, is faith.” Pages of other passages might be
quoted had I time, but these are enough to show the real point at issue.
Rome taught that the sign was transubstantiated into the thing signified,
and so ceased to be a sign as it became a living Saviour, localised on
the altar with body, soul, and even bones and nerves. The Church of
England taught that the risen Lord is “in heaven and not here,” that the
sign remains a material, visible sign, and that the grace is a spiritual
grace. So that, as is well said in the homily, “The meat we seek for in
this supper is spiritual food; and nourishment of our soul, a heavenly
refection, and not earthly; an invisible meat and not carnal.” And
again, “Look up with faith upon the body and blood of thy God, thou
marvel with reverence, thou touch it with the mind, then receive it with
the hand of thine heart, and thou take it fully with thy inward man.”
* * * * *
(4.)—_The Final Completeness of the one Propitiation_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account