Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciencesWhewell, William
Philosophy
Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciences
Whewell, William
Science -- Philosophy
8. In the measurement of linear space, there is no natural standard
which offers itself. Most of the common measures appear to be taken
from some part of the human body; as a _foot_, a _cubit_, a
_fathom_; but such measures cannot possess any precision, and are
altered by convention: thus there were in ancient times many kinds
of cubits; and in modern Europe, there are a great number of
different standards of the foot, as the Rhenish foot, the Paris
foot, the English foot. It is {150} very desirable that, if
possible, some permanent standard, founded in nature, should be
adopted; for the conventional measures are lost in the course of
ages; and thus, dimensions expressed by means of them become
unintelligible. Two different natural standards have been employed
in modern times: the French have referred their measures of length
to the total circumference of a meridian of the earth; a quadrant of
this meridian consists of ten million units or _metres_. The English
have fixed their linear measure by reference to the length of a
pendulum which employs an exact second of time in its small
oscillation. Both these methods occasion considerable difficulties
in carrying them into effect; and are to be considered mainly as
means of recovering the standard if it should ever be lost. For
common purposes, some material standard is adopted as authority for
the time: for example, the standard which in England possessed legal
authority up to the year 1835 was preserved in the House of
Parliament; and was lost in the conflagration which destroyed that
edifice. The standard of length now generally referred to by men of
science in England is that which is in the possession of the
Astronomical Society of London.
9. A standard of length being established, the artifices for
applying it, and for subdividing it in the most accurate manner, are
nearly the same as in the case of measures of arcs: as for instance,
the employment of the visual rays of microscopes instead of the legs
of compasses and the edges of rules; the use of micrometers for
minute measurements; and the like. Many different modes of avoiding
errour in such measurements have been devised by various observers,
according to the nature of the cases with which they had to
deal[4\3].
[Note 4\3: On the precautions employed in astronomical instruments
for the measure of space, see Sir J. Herschel's _Astronomy_ (in the
_Cabinet Cyclopædia_,) Arts. 103-110.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account