Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciencesWhewell, William
Philosophy
Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciences
Whewell, William
Science -- Philosophy
_We collect individuals into_ Kinds _by applying to them the Idea of
Likeness. Kinds of things are not determined by definitions, but by
this condition:--that general assertions concerning such kinds of
things shall be possible._ (VIII. 1.)
LXXXIV.
_The_ Names _of kinds of things are governed by their use; and that
may be a right name in one use which is not so in another. A whale
is not a_ fish _in natural history, but it is a_ fish _in commerce
and law._ (VIII. 1.)
LXXXV.
_We take for granted that each kind of things has a special_
character _which may be expressed by a Definition. The ground of our
assumption is this;--that reasoning must be possible._ (VIII. 1.)
LXXXVI.
_The "Five Words,"_ Genus, Species, Difference, Property, Accident,
_were used by the Aristotelians, in order to express the
subordination of Kinds, and to describe the nature of Definitions
and Propositions. In modern times, these technical expressions have
been more referred to by Natural Historians than by Metaphysicians._
(VIII. 1.)
LXXXVII.
_The construction of a Classificatory Science includes_ Terminology,
_the formation of a descriptive language;_--Diataxis, _the Plan of
the System of Classification, called_ {21} _also the_
Systematick;--Diagnosis, _the Scheme of the Characters by which the
different Classes are known, called also the_ Characteristick.
Physiography _is the knowledge which the System is employed to
convey. Diataxis includes_ Nomenclature. (VIII. 2.)
LXXXVIII.
Terminology _must be conventional, precise, constant; copious in
words, and minute in distinctions, according to the needs of the
science. The student must understand the terms,_ directly _according
to the convention, not through the medium of explanation or
comparison._ (VIII. 2.)
LXXXIX.
_The_ Diataxis,_ or Plan of the System, may aim at a Natural or at
an Artificial System. But no classes can be absolutely artificial,
for if they were, no assertions could be made concerning them._
(VIII. 2.)
XC.
_An_ Artificial System _is one in which the_ smaller _groups_ (_the
Genera_) _are_ natural; _and in which the_ wider _divisions_
(_Classes, Orders_) _are constructed by the_ peremptory _application
of selected Characters;_ (_selected, however, so as not to break up
the smaller groups._) (VIII. 2.)
XCI.
_A_ Natural System _is one which attempts to make_ all _the
divisions_ natural, _the widest as well as the narrowest; and
therefore applies_ no _characters_ peremptorily. (VIII. 2.)
XCII.
_Natural Groups are best described, not by any Definition which
marks their boundaries, but by a_ Type _which marks their center.
The Type of any natural group is an example which possesses in a
marked degree all the leading characters of the class._ (VIII. 2.)
{22}
XCIII.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account