Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciencesWhewell, William
Philosophy
Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciences
Whewell, William
Science -- Philosophy
4. (_a._) Abstract substantives can easily be formed from
adjectives: from electric we have _electricity_; from galvanic,
_galvanism_; from organic, _organization_; _velocity_, _levity_,
_gravity_, are borrowed from Latin adjectives. _Caloric_ is
familiarly used for the matter of heat, though the form of the word
is not supported by any obvious analogy.
(_b._) It is intolerable to have words regularly formed, in
opposition to the analogy which their meaning offers; as when bodies
are said to have conduct_ibility_ or conduc_ibility_ with regard to
heat. The bodies are conduct_ive_, and their property is
conduct_ivity_.
(_c._) The terminations _ize_ (rather than _ise_), _ism_, and _ist_,
are applied to words of all origins: thus we have to {338}
_pulverize_, to _colonize_, _Witticism_, _Heathenism_, _Journalist_,
_Tobacconist_. Hence we may make such words when they are wanted. As
we cannot use _physician_ for a cultivator of physics, I have called
him a _Physicist_. We need very much a name to describe a cultivator
of science in general. I should incline to call him a _Scientist_.
Thus we might say, that as an Artist is a Musician, Painter, or
Poet, a Scientist is a Mathematician, Physicist, or Naturalist.
(_d._) Connected with verbs in _ize_, we have abstract nouns in
_ization_, as _polarization_, _crystallization_. These it appears
proper to spell in English with _z_ rather than _s_; governing our
practice by the Greek verbal termination ίζω which we imitate. But
we must observe that verbs and substantives in _yse_, (_analyse_),
belong to a different analogy, giving an abstract noun in _ysis_ and
an adjective _ytic_ or _ytical_; (_analysis_, _analytic_,
_analytical_). Hence _electrolyse_ is more proper than
_electrolyze_.
(_e._) The names of many sciences end in _ics_ after the analogy of
_Mathematics_, _Metaphysics_; as _Optics_, _Mechanics_. But these,
in most other languages, as in our own formerly, have the singular
form _Optice_, _l'Optique_, _Optik_, _Optick_: and though we now write
_Optics_, we make such words of the singular number: 'Newton's
Opticks is an example.' As, however, this connexion in new words is
startling, as when we say 'Thermo-electrics is now much cultivated,'
it appears better to employ the singular form, after the analogy of
_Logic_ and _Rhetoric_, when we have words to construct. Hence we
may call the science of languages _Linguistic_, as it is called by
the best German writers, for instance, William Von Humboldt.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account