Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciencesWhewell, William
Philosophy
Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciences
Whewell, William
Science -- Philosophy
Besides these doctrines of _Special Homology_ by which the bones of
all vertebrates are referred to their corresponding bones in the
human skeleton, and of _General Homology_, by which the bones are
referred to the parts of vertebræ which they represent, Mr. Owen
treats of _Serial Homology_, the recognition of the same elements
throughout the series of segments of the same skeleton; as when we
shew in what manner the arms correspond to the legs. And thus, he
says, in the head also, the _basioccipital_, _basisphenoid_,
_presphenoid_ and _vomer_ are {357} homotypes with the _centrums_ of
all succeeding vertebræ. The _excoccipitals_,_ alisphenoids_,
_orbitosphenoids_, and _prefrontals_, are homotypes with the
_neurapophyses_ of all the succeeding vertebræ. The _paroccipitals_,
_mactoids_ and _postfrontals_, with the _transverse processes_ of
all the succeeding vertebræ: and so on. Perhaps these examples may
exemplify sufficiently for the general reader both Mr. Owen's
terminology, and the intimate manner in which it is connected with
the widest generalizations to which anatomical philosophy has yet
been led.
The same doctrine, that the history of the Language of a Science is
the history of the Science, appears also in the recent progress of
Chemistry; but we shall be better able to illustrate our Aphorism in
this case by putting forward previously one or two other Aphorisms
bearing upon the history of that Science.
APHORISM XXVI.
_In the Terminology of Science it may be necessary to employ
letters, numbers, and algebraical symbols._
1. MINERALOGY.
I HAVE already said, in Aphorism XV., that symbols have been found
requisite as a part of the terminology of Mineralogy. The _names_
proposed by Haüy, borrowed from the crystalline laws, were so
inadequate and unsystematic that they could not be retained. He
himself proposed a _notation_ for crystalline forms, founded upon
his principle of the derivation of such forms from a _primitive_
form, by _decrements_, on its _edges_ or its _angles_. To denote
this derivation he took the first letters of the three syllables to
mark the faces of the _PriMiTive_ form, _P_, _M_, _T_; the vowels
_A_, _E_, _I_, _O_ to mark the angles; the consonants _B_, _C_, _D_,
&c. to mark the edges; and numerical exponents, annexed in various
positions to these letters, represented the law and manner of
derivation. Thus when the primitive form was a cube,
1
_B_
represented the result of a derivation by a decrement of one row
{358} on an edge; that is, a rhombic octahedron; and
1
_BP_ represented the combination of this octahedron with the
primitive cube. In this way the pentagonal dodecahedron, produced by
decrements of 2 to 1 on half the edges of the cube, was represented by
½
_B_² _C G_² ²_G_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account