Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciencesWhewell, William
Philosophy
Novum organon renovatum: Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciences
Whewell, William
Science -- Philosophy
9. A maxim which it may be useful to recollect is this;--that
_hypotheses may often be of service to science, when they involve a
certain portion of incompleteness, and even of errour_. The object
of such inventions is to bind together facts which without them are
loose and detached; and if they do this, they may lead the way to a
perception of the true rule by which the phenomena are associated
together, even if they themselves somewhat misstate the matter. The
imagined arrangement enables us to contemplate, as a whole, a
collection of special cases which perplex and overload our minds
when they are considered in succession; and if our scheme has so
much of truth in it as to conjoin what is really connected, we may
afterwards duly correct or limit the mechanism of this connexion. If
our hypothesis renders a reason for the agreement of cases really
similar, we may afterwards find this reason to be {84} false, but we
shall be able to translate it into the language of truth.
A conspicuous example of such an hypothesis,--one which was of the
highest value to science, though very incomplete, and as a
representation of nature altogether false,--is seen in the _Doctrine
of epicycles_ by which the ancient astronomers explained the motions
of the sun, moon, and planets. This doctrine connected the places
and velocities of these bodies at particular times in a manner which
was, in its general features, agreeable to nature. Yet this doctrine
was erroneous in its assertion of the _circular_ nature of all the
celestial motions, and in making the heavenly bodies revolve _round
the earth_. It was, however, of immense value to the progress of
astronomical science; for it enabled men to express and reason upon
many important truths which they discovered respecting the motion of
the stars, up to the time of Kepler. Indeed we can hardly imagine
that astronomy could, in its outset, have made so great a progress
under any other form, as it did in consequence of being cultivated
in this shape of the incomplete and false _epicyclical hypothesis_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account