The next important advance was contributed in 1946 by Arthur Holmes in
England and by F. G. Houtermans in Germany. Each of these scientists had
seen Nier’s reports before the war and had realized that Nier’s
mass-spectrometer analyses of lead made it possible, for the first time,
to make rational calculations about the age of the earth. The two
scientists independently calculated that age at about 2 to 3 billion
years, using the handful of data available to them from Nier’s
measurements. It is interesting that today, thousands of analyses later,
our planet’s age usually is given as 4.5 billion years. The early
estimates were not far off.
Development of various methods for measuring the age of minerals
followed rapidly, and by 1955 many fundamental studies needed for
measuring the age of very old substances were complete. The basic
techniques are summarized in Table I. They will be explained later. The
new methods produced broad confirmation of the early rough estimates and
they also brought a few surprises.
Before we go into these discoveries, let us look at some theoretical
foundations.
Table I BASIC MEASUREMENT METHODS
Method Material Time Dated Useful Time Span
(years)
Carbon-14 Wood, peat, When plant died 1000-50,000
charcoal
Bone, shell Slightly before 2000-35,000
animal died
Potassium-argon Mica, some When rock last 100,000 and up
whole rocks cooled to about
300°C
Hornblende When rock last 10,000,000 and up
Sanidine cooled to about
500°C
Rubidium-strontium Mica When rock last 5,000,000 and up
cooled to about
300°C
Potash When rock last 50,000,000 and up
feldspar cooled to about
500°C
Whole rock Time of 100,000,000 and up
separation of
the rock as a
closed unit
Uranium-lead Zircon When crystals 200,000,000 and up
formed
Uranium-238 Many When rock last 100-1,000,000,000
fission cooled (Depending on
material)
[Illustration: _Time scale of the Earth, drawn to scale. See also the
Holmes time scale on page 46._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account