American fiction -- 20th century; Short stories, American -- Periodicals
Typical of the American scene and of American life are “Nice
Neighbours,” “The One Hundred Dollar Bill,” “Towers of Fame,” “Not
Wanted.” To these should be added Mrs. Wharton’s “False Dawn,” of the
first list. Though in length outside the short story limit,
nevertheless, it should receive mention as a notable piece of brief
fiction. Failure to record appreciation of its exquisite charm would
argue the Committee dull to beauty of theme and workmanship.
“Nice Neighbours,” a vigorous story dramatically presented, conveys a
pleasantly satiric theme which every reader may state for himself. Mary
S. Watts has accomplished her satire the more admirably in that she does
so without the aid of caricature. Her characters, from the imps of Satan
who killed their pets for the gruesome pleasure of it, to the nice old
maid who rented her house--all walk out of life, distorted by not even
so much as the temperament of the author which, justifiably, might have
exaggerated lines and heightened colour.
Mr. Tarkington’s “The One Hundred Dollar Bill” so skilfully conceals its
idea as to betray the unwary into seeing merely a light story, whereas
it epitomizes the American character. Behold the American: Caution and
thrift refuse the purchase of a toy yet retreat before the gambler’s
spirit. Loss at the gaming table retrieves itself through that
adaptability which leads on alike to failure or fortune. In the opinion
of many readers who have enjoyed all this author’s stories, from “In the
Arena” to the present, nothing he has written is stronger and at once
more subtle than “The One Hundred Dollar Bill.” If there is such a thing
as a composite American, he is represented by Collinson.
Eric Hall, of Mrs. Folsom’s “Towers of Fame,” is the counterpart of
Emanuel in “The Distant Street.” Eric meets the one woman, who might
have remained lost. So great is this possibility as to form the basis
for surprise. We finish the story: Eric left the girl. Add a final
hundred words or so and demolish the first dénouement. The new ending is
as just as the old. The adherent of the negative and the incomplete
says, “Eric went away, of course. And he never came back.” Quite right,
if Eric was that sort of man. But the partisan of the positive may
reply, “Why didn’t he go back? It was just that return which reveals his
character.” He is the older American; Emanuel is the newcomer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account