Dr. Bell, who had been sitting next the coroner, in a juxta position with
one of the jury, with whom he was observed to be often earnestly talking,
then rose, and said “He could not leave that room without offering a
defence for the sake of his family and friends, as he perceived that his
character was at stake, and in spite of the remonstrance used by Mr.
Webber. Dr. Bell obtained the sanction of the court, and was proceeding
to state, that he was M.D. surgeon, when Mr. Webber objected such was not
evidence, that the coroner was at liberty to call Wm. Bell, of Norwich,
but that this witness must state his qualification on oath. He was then
formally sworn, and stated, “I am a surgeon M.D. at Norwich. The man was
sent to me from Knapton, by Mrs. Shirley, (whose letter the witness
read.) The man reported to me that he had been ill on the previous
harvest—that he had been attended by Mr. Coleby daily, and that he had
been under his treatment until he visited me on the morning of the 11th
of February. His symptoms led me to ask him if Mr. Coleby had ever
examined his bladder, naturally suspecting that he was labouring under
stone. He said that Mr. Coleby had done so, and told him that there was
no stone. That for months he had passed blood, and on some occasions
something remained at the bottom of the vessel he used, if allowed to
stand. He appeared to be extremely weak and emaciated. I took him to my
house where I examined him with a sound, and immediately detected a small
stone. I then wrote to Mrs. Shirley, of which I have kept a copy, but
that lady has lost the original. Dr. Bell then read a note in which was
stated that he had examined the man, who was in a deplorable state. That
he had a small stone in his bladder, and had evidently been under a
dangerous affection since last harvest—she could adopt one of three
courses—_she could place him under the care of Mr. Coleby again_, _and
when his attention was more immediately directed to the case_, _perhaps
he would be more fortunate in detecting the nature of the complaint_—or
she could send him to the Norfolk and Norwich Hospital—or she could place
Swann under his care, and he should be happy to attend without any
charge, and the only expense would be for his board and lodging.
Whatever plan should be adopted, let it be with the sanction of Mr.
Coleby, and if he found relief from that gentleman, he was not to be
taken from him, but strictly to attend to his (Dr. Bell’s) directions pro
tempore. He also read a note from Mrs. Shirley, wherein she sanctioned
Swann being under his care.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account