Observations on the Operation and Use of Mercury in the Venereal DiseaseDuncan, Andrew
History
Observations on the Operation and Use of Mercury in the Venereal Disease
Duncan, Andrew
Mercury -- Therapeutic use -- Early works to 1800; Sexually transmitted diseases -- Early works to 1800
But, to prove that evacuation will not cure the distemper, it is
needless to travel back to the first periods of this disease, or to rest
the evidence even upon the highest probability. From what occurs in many
morbid cases, we have every day evident proof of the insufficiency of
any discharge for producing a cure of the venereal disease. _Lues
venerea_ often exists at the same time with diseases in which an
increase of natural evacuations takes place. None of these diseases,
whether the evacuation happens by the salivary glands, as in small-pox,
by stool, as in dysentery, or by the skin, as in intermittents, have
ever been found to break its force, much less to produce a perfect cure.
Besides what happens in natural evacuations, we have likewise proofs of
the insufficiency of artificial evacuations for the cure of this
disease. Although evacuation, at least by other means than by the use of
mercury, is never now employed as a cure for the venereal disease; yet
venereal complaints are often complicated with others, for which various
evacuations are proper. And while evacuations are, with success,
employed for the cure of these, it is found, that the venereal taint
either remains unchanged, or is even increased in force. It cannot here
be alledged, that the difference of effect depends upon the mode of
evacuation. On such occasions, every mode of evacuation has been tried
with equal want of success. Even salivation, which was long considered
as the only effectual discharge, when excited by other means than by
mercury, or even by mercury itself, when externally applied to the
organs secreting saliva, has not been found more effectual than other
modes of evacuation. In some cases, indeed, mercury received into the
mouth by steam, or otherwise, has had good effects; but these were
either to be accounted for from its application to the diseased part, or
from its introduction into the system. It is, then, sufficiently
evident, that evacuation, at least by other means than mercury, does not
cure _lues venerea_.
To this theory it may be urged as a third, and not less powerful
objection than any of the former, that where the evacuation arising from
the use of mercury in _lues venerea_ is the greatest, the cure is often
retarded; and that mercury never more frequently fails than in those
cases where it begins to evacuate upon its first introduction into the
system.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account